My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-02-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-02-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2012 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 4:35:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/13/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. B. - Page 9 <br /> the CEQA Guidelines, "economic and social changes resulting from a project shall not <br /> be treated as significant effects on the environment." Economic and social changes <br /> may be addressed under CEQA only if they will produce changes in the physical <br /> environment, such as urban decay. However, redevelopment of an underutilized <br /> property along a major transportation corridor with a new, 141-unit, transit-oriented, infill <br /> housing project will not result in an urban decay impact. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> • Uphold the appeal(s), thereby overturning the Planning Commissions certification <br /> of the EIR and Project approvals. The City Council will need to make the findings <br /> required by Government Code Section 65589.5 if it overturns the Planning <br /> Commission's Project approvals thereby denying the Project. <br /> • Deny the appeal(s), thereby upholding the Planning Commission's certification of <br /> the EIR and approval of the Planned Development Permit and Vesting Tentative <br /> Map without changes. This is the City Manager's and City Staff's <br /> recommendation. <br /> • Deny the appeal(s), thereby upholding the Planning Commission's certification of <br /> the EIR, but require revisions to the Planned Development Permit and/or the <br /> Vesting Tentative Map conditions of approval. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> No fiscal impact to the City's general fund is expected for reviewing the development <br /> proposal as the proposal is covered by the Redwood City cost recovery system. The <br /> applicant has submitted a deposit to cover the cost of staff time and consultant services <br /> needed to review the development proposal. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> An Environmental Impact Report was completed for the 2580 EI Camino Real <br /> Residential Project. <br /> r <br /> _-� � <br /> ��� � ,,� , , <br /> %i%!'luz� /Ci ``l�wti>; l) <br /> i ; <br /> MAUREEN RIORDAN <br /> SENIOR PLANNER <br /> ����� <br /> BILL EKERN <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br /> �" <br /> ROBERT B. BELL <br /> CITY MANAGER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.