AgdaPkt 2012-02-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8. B. - Page 23 Maur��n Riordan. Oc�ober 26, 2�� 1 Page 8 and the unknown na�ure of tk�e saurces warrant a ma�e d�tailed analysis o�'th�ir paten�ially si.gnifica�t cu.z�ula�ive impacts. The DEI� �.c�t only mislear�s th� public, but pzeclur�es a zneaningf�zl analysis o�'�ot�ntial impacts fiom TACs and PM2.5 fiom tk�e Pioject's propasal to site sensitive receptors nearby. I� Dx. Clark's opinion, by i�cludin� th� ac��itiional ai.x� pollutant �m.issians frnm th�s� sources in the baselii�e, the DEI�, m.ay co�clude that the Prc�jeet significantly impacts �esidential receptors o�� t�e Project sit�. C. '�'`h� �EI�, con�;ai�s c€�a��c�%x�g d�s��°i�tions of b�seline c�nditaoa�s agains� �hz�h to �easizre ianpaets The I3ETR i�co��aistently describes whether tkze e�isting er�viron�ne�tal s��t,ing includes a restaurant �ha� i� ope� ating p� not oper. a�;ing. The fail�re a�' the DEIR to dascri�e r.est�urant c�perat�ons ca��sist�n.�ly precludes a�saningful analysis �f th� Projec�'s zrz�pacts ir�cluding energy usage, pu}�lic hea]th, ��a,s�ewa�er flows, tr�ffic and gr��nhouse gas emissions. The City mu�t ievise i;he DE�R sr� that the pul�lic and decz�ion mak�rs are in�or�ned regard�ng wh�ther the restaurant zs cuz�ently operational or clos�d. The DE�R describes the restaurant ii�z tl�� bowIing alley as operational in the energy sectio�. and nonopera�;iona� in �he haza�dous materials and utilities sectians. Speci�ically, the DEIR asses�es �he Project's im�acts �o �nergy usa�e agaznst the natura� gas used by both i;he bowling alley and the restauranf;.�a Howeve�, in the l]EIK,'s descripfiion of existing chem�cal storage, �h� I�EIR sta�es that the restaurant i.n �he bawli�g alley is nonop�ra�ional.�� The DE�R also describes �he curr�n� Iand us� as only generating 803 gallans o�'w�stewa�er per day k�ecause �he restaurant is r�ot c��erational.� If the restau�a�t is nonopera�ional, the City r�ust revi.se th� �raject's d.escrip�ion o� the ex�st�ng set�ing under �he ane�gy sectio�_ If t��e restaurant is op�ra�ional, th� DEIR must disclase pc�tentiaJ. cheznical usage an site and xeassess �h� Prajeeti's impacts to v�ast�wa�er �reatment cap�city. The City's failtxr� to znclude a consis�ent description o£ baseline conditions confuses �he DEIR's iznpact analysia for energy usa��, public health, was�e`��a�er flows, traffic and ��eenhause gas �missions. For exaz�ple, the DFIR states that t�� 30 5ee Clark cominenis, p. I 7. �� DE�R, p. 66. 3 � Id. �t p, 5�. � at p. 94. `ZJ�')C7.��$] ,