My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-02-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-02-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2012 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 4:35:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/13/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. B. - Page 24 <br /> Maureen ]�,iardan <br /> 4ctnl�e� 2F�, 201.1 <br /> Page 9 <br /> existing bdwling al.ley ze�easea approximateJy 77 � metric i;c�ns of C�2e per yeax fram <br /> �ransportation, �lect�icaty use, natural gas use, water use, wasteivater ge�eratior� <br /> �nd solid waste ge�era�ian. The DFIR does not sp�cify, howerret, whether <br /> xestauran� op�iation was f�actored inta this assessment. Depending on whe�he� �he <br /> �estaa�rant was opera�ional or no� i�hen �nvirnnmen�al zeview comm�nceo�, t�e <br /> DEIR's analysis �ay change. <br /> The City must r�vise the DEIR ta include a description of a�eal cc�nditions o� <br /> the graund sa thai; �h� Projecti's actual impac�s to energy usa�e, Lvastewater, p�xblic <br /> health, traffic a3�d greenhouse gas emissions can �e assc�ssed. This t~evi�ed <br /> description ��zd. i��act analysis r�ust be r�ci�cula�ed for publie review. <br /> IV. '�HE T)EIT�„ F�YLS 'T'� D����.�}S� �T�L �'f�'�`E� <br /> SIGl\���'��A:I�TT P�.��IEC� TiV�P1�C"T'S �ND �ArT�QI�,�OI�A�`E �LL <br /> F'��S�k3L� MI'�'T��TIOI� 1���SUR,�S 1���E�S1���'.' `T'O �.��J�JCE <br /> 31'YAIL� �[.+ k� 1 V S3 le� V L' ��� �J.� ���li` �L <br /> 1�. `�'�� ����i �'aafls �� di���c�se �1�. pa�����al�y sigx�i�ae��� �r��'��� <br /> i��a�cts a�� ar��ox°�or��� �lI ���sible a�aitigat��� �neas�xe� <br /> Tam Broha.rd, P.E., a]ac�nsed professional civil en.�ine�r, ieviewed th� <br /> DEIR's analysis af impacts to traffic. Mr. Brohard d�t�rmined t,hat �h� City failed <br /> ta disclose and analvz� aIl of the F'rojec�'s i�npacts and �ropose a11 feasible <br /> mi�igatian measuxcs. Therefore, the Citp rriust r�vise its anal.ysis c3f �he Project's <br /> impacts to traffic. <br /> 1. The �EI�i �Fa�ls t€� an�lyz� ia�p�c�s to tr��'�ic and parl�iBag <br /> d��r��g k'�a,�ec� cor�st��xc�ior� <br /> Th� I)EIR comp�etely fails to analyze tra�fic iz�apacts associat�ed with Pioject <br /> construetian. T�� City must disclose potent�.ally signzf�cant impacts associated wi�h <br /> constructi.on t�affic and inco�porate sp�cz£ic m�tigai;ioiz measu�es. <br /> Accordin� ta th.� DE�R, construc�ion wauld be carripleted over a peariad of I9 <br /> mo��.ths.�� Durin� those �9 months, site devclopment would include demolitian of <br /> sa Id. at p. 8S. <br /> ss Id. at p. 78, <br /> 25G6.OQ8j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.