Laserfiche WebLink
Under the "Public Safety" priority there was consensus to add "Mai tai [ ns re adequate <br />public safety ". It was suggested that "anti-gang activities" be placed under this priority. <br />There was Council concurrence to implement such change. <br />On the "Economic Development" ent" priority there was Council consensus to make it citywide. <br />Council also agreed that under "Transportation and Traffic adding "comer and <br />transportation 33 would better reflect council direction. After some discussion, council <br />agreed to add the Strategic Plan to the i'Government operations" priority. In addition, it <br />was agreed that adding "Be in a state of readiness ess for funding opportunities" would e <br />important. <br />Under the "Community/Civic Support" priority there was some discussion about <br />identification of ne w parks and public spaces. Council discussed neighborhood <br />revitalization but the consensus was to bring this item back for discussion in conjunction <br />with the General Plan. Mr. Ingram explained that General Plan consultants will focused on <br />this area. on the topic of neighborhood revitalization, on, some council Members suggested <br />having a conversation with the community present and against the b ackdrop of the <br />General tan. <br />On the "Youth Agenda" priority, Council suggested reordering the bullet points. After <br />some discussion ]it was agreed that "After school enrichment programs should be added <br />to this priority. Council also agreed to add a bullet point titled "Redwood City Youth <br />Collaborate Initiative" to better reflect the Council interest in that area. Council also agreed <br />with adding "Never Parrs and public spaces' under the Community/Civic Support" priority. <br />Throughout the Council discussion staff provided information on various issues that <br />needed clarification. <br />Council took a break at 9:22 p.m. and the meeting restarted a 9:35 p.m. <br />Council then focused on the items that had budget implications (attachment four of the <br />staff report). Council expressed an interest in seeing potential revenue increases with the <br />budget process in June. There was Council consensus to add $50,000 to increase <br />funding for citywide economic development initiatives with the Chamber of Commerce. <br />On the item of the Emergency Preparedness trailers, Council would like staff to come back <br />with an implementation plan and various funding possibilities (this report to include <br />information from a resource and communication standpoint). It was suggested that <br />phasing the implementation entation should also be looked at. <br />Under the Code Enforcement item staff said that a new employee was just hired and staff <br />can report back on the impacts of that position and the ambassador program. Council <br />agreed with having some information about this topic in the budget packet and report back <br />at a later-time so Council can understand the nexus between the resources and the <br />services provided. <br />Council did not discuss infrastructure improvements because this matter will come to <br />Council via the capital Improvements Projects discussion in May. on the issue of <br />JOINT CITY COUNCUI E EVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING MARCH 10, 2008 <br />MINUTES PAGE <br />MINUTE BOOK NO, 62 <br />Page No. 40 <br />