My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2008-02-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
CC Min 2008-02-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 3:12:08 PM
Creation date
2/21/2012 3:09:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
2/25/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council asked clarifying questions about the challenges Ms. Quezada finds in using the <br />Redwood. Shores dog park. The speaker provided her iris on hoer she experiences the <br />dog park in Redwood Shores. <br />Claire Felong addressed council on the need for communication and using various <br />mediums to engage the public. She supports "Green Building codes" and she shared her <br />excitement about working on the cool cities Team. Ms. Felong stated that the St. Francis <br />Center is LEER certified and this is an example of an organization being proactive to <br />become "green'}. <br />Coun cil took at I 0-min ute break from 8:40 p. m. to :55 p. m. <br />Dr. Manning asked the Council if the five current priorities are acceptable to the council. <br />After some discussion, there was consensus that the current priorities were adequate, <br />however there was mention that the following items were missing: infrastructure, revitalizing <br />neighborhoods and the dog park. It was suggested that these additional items, are under <br />the umbrella of government operations. council discussed the dog park as b eing under the <br />CI (capital Improvement Projects) and how this has long -term implications because of <br />maintenance. Co ncil asked questions about specific projects on the ma trix and their <br />statuses. <br />Council discussed topics such as economic -development, the bicycle pedestrian committee <br />and staff provided additional information. Police Department staffing levels were also <br />discussed and the chief provided details on the hiring levels. Emergency preparedness <br />was also discussed. council asked questions of staff regarding various projects related to <br />water, partnerships with other entities, youth support and positive approaches, downtown <br />ambassadors, noticing and posting requirements, economic development and proposed <br />residential developments. Regarding the economic development and the progress made in <br />the downtown, it was suggested that a report be brought back incorporating what is <br />happening or will happen in downtown Redwood city. Such report would address parking, <br />marketing, the downtown precise plan, housing and any other areas that may be applicable. <br />Such report would first go through the Downtown Committee, then the council <br />Subcommittee and then come back to council. There was a suggestion to add a sixth <br />priority that focuses on youth and education. <br />Dr. Manning invited council Members to lobby for particular projects. Individual Council <br />Members shared an interest in the following areas or projects. increase resources in areas <br />that were previously cut, raise revenues, improve the quality of life, create a community <br />newsletter to reach out to the community, expand youth and education programs, increase <br />funds for economic development, and expand code enforcement services. Other issues <br />mentioned: disaster preparedness, dog parks, neighborhood revitalization, youth and <br />more solution oriented approach, economic vitality, the creation of a Green citizens' <br />Advisory Committee, infrastructure and housing, healthy and sustainable community, this <br />being a destination city with more cultural and regional draw. Training for City <br />Commissioners w also one of the ideas mentioned by one council Member. Additional <br />comments included the need for the reporting from the community Input sessions to be <br />JOINT CITY COUNCUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 2008 <br />MINUTES PAGE <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 62 <br />Page No. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.