My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-02-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 4:08:32 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 4:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/27/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 1 <br />REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the City Manager <br />February 27, 2012 <br />SUBJECT <br />New Ordinance Regulating Video Franchises Pursuant to DIVCA <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Waive First Reading and Introduce An Ordinance Repealing Existing Article III (Cable <br />Television Systems) and Enacting New Article III to Chapter 11 Relating to Video <br />Service Franchises. <br />BACKGROUND <br />This report concerns a proposed ordinance to add Article IV to Chapter 11 (Privately <br />Owned Utilities) to the Redwood City Municipal Code, for the purpose of implementing <br />the provisions of the Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 (DIVCA), <br />codified in California Public Utilities Code Section 5800, and following. The ordinance, if <br />enacted, would authorize the City to fully exercise the regulatory authority that it retains <br />under DIVCA, including to continue to collect franchise fees and PEG fees. The Finance <br />Subcommittee of the City Council has reviewed this proposed ordinance and <br />recommended that the City Council consider it for introduction and adoption. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Before DIVCA went into effect on January 1, 2007, local governments had the authority <br />to issue franchises to companies to install their cable systems in public rights of way and <br />provide cable service to City residents. The City exercised this authority pursuant to <br />Article III of Chapter 11 of the Municipal Code, and had issued cable franchises to both <br />Comcast and Astound (formerly RCN). Between the requirements of the Municipal <br />Code and the franchise terms, the cable companies had obligations to pay franchise <br />fees and public, educational and governmental (PEG) access fees, as well as to meet <br />other requirements relating to construction, consumer protection, security and <br />insurance, and transfers of ownership, consistent with federal law. <br />DIVCA created a new regulatory scheme for state video franchising, essentially shifting <br />franchising authority away from local government to the California Public Utilities <br />Commission (CPUC). Under DIVCA, the CPUC does not consider local cable - related <br />needs and interests when it issues a state franchise. Rather, the CPUC will issue a 10 <br />year state franchise to any provider that completes a simple application form and meets <br />minimum insurance and bonding requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.