My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-02-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 4:08:32 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 4:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/27/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 2 <br />Under DIVCA, new entrants into a market that are not operating under a franchise <br />issued by a local government are permitted to obtain a state franchise at any time. <br />Incumbent cable operators, such as Comcast and Astound, were required to continue to <br />operate under their local franchises until either their local franchise expired or a new <br />provider, such as AT &T or Verizon, begins offering services under a state franchise, at <br />which point an incumbent may elect to terminate its local franchise and obtain a state <br />franchise. <br />AT &T obtained a state franchise from the CPUC to serve the City effective March 30, <br />2007 and thereafter began offering video services in the City under this state franchise. <br />As a result, Comcast and Astound both opted out of their local franchises with the City <br />and began operating under state franchises effective January 2, 2008, and November 9, <br />2009, respectively. Had they not opted to switch to a state franchise, Comcast's local <br />franchise would have remained fully in force until 2021. Astound's local franchise has <br />expired on its own terms. Accordingly, Comcast, Astound and AT &T all serve the City <br />under state video franchises. <br />While DIVCA shifts much of the regulatory authority over video providers to the CPUC, it <br />does preserve some local government regulatory authority. For example, DIVCA allows <br />local authorities: (i) to continue to collect franchise fees subject to a 5% cap; (ii) to <br />continue to collect PEG fees subject to certain limitations; (iii) to enforce customer <br />service standards imposed under state and federal law; and (iv) to continue to impose <br />right -of -way management and permitting requirements, subject to certain restrictions <br />imposed by DIVCA. <br />The purpose of the proposed ordinance presented to the Council is to allow the City to <br />implement and enforce its local authority preserved under DIVCA, as follows: <br />1) DIVCA allows local governments to assess a franchise fee on holders of state <br />franchises in an amount not to exceed what is being charged to incumbent providers <br />and in any case not to exceed 5% of gross revenues. <br />The proposed ordinance is designed to implement the regulatory authority that <br />has been preserved to the City under DIVCA. The ordinance imposes a 5% <br />franchise fee, the same as was imposed on incumbent cable companies under <br />local franchises, and the maximum permitted under DIVCA. The ordinance also <br />imposes the maximum late charge allowed under DIVCA. <br />2) DIVCA allows local governments to establish a fee by ordinance to support public, <br />educational and government (PEG) channel facilities, subject to certain limitations. <br />The PEG fee may be between 1% and 3% of gross revenues, depending on the fee <br />a local government was charging an incumbent cable provider as of December 31, <br />2006. If a PEG fee under a franchise agreement was less than 1%, the City can <br />charge 1%, but if greater than that, it cannot charge more than what the operator <br />was paying and in any case no more than 3 %. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.