Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 3 <br />The Finance Department has analyzed the PEG fees being paid by cable <br />operators under former franchise agreements, which in some cases were a <br />set cash amount to be paid over time. Staff determined that the appropriate <br />fee is 1 % of gross revenues and accordingly, the proposed Ordinance <br />provides that all state franchise holders shall pay PEG fees in the amount of <br />1% of gross revenues. This requirement is consistent with DIVCA, which <br />requires that all video service providers, including the incumbent, shall pay the <br />same PEG fee. <br />3) DIVCA preserves local authority to regulate the time, place and manner of facilities <br />and equipment that are placed in the rights -of -way by state franchise holders, but <br />requires that this authority be exercised consistent with how the local authority <br />regulates the use of the rights -of -way by telecommunications providers. <br />The ordinance provides that state franchise holders must comply with the same right - <br />of -way permitting requirements the City imposes on other users of the right -of -way, <br />including telecommunications providers. The ordinance also provides for a 60 -day <br />limit for the City to issue or deny an encroachment permit, and imposes a clear <br />mechanism for appealing permit denials to the Council, as required under DIVCA. <br />4) DIVCA preserves the authority of local governments to enforce state and federal <br />customer service requirements and directs that local governments adopt a schedule <br />of penalties for violations of such customer service standards. However, the amount <br />of penalties a local authority may impose is greatly restricted by DIVCA and half of <br />any amount collected must be turned over to the state. <br />The ordinance, implements a schedule of penalties for violations of customer service <br />standards. The penalties, which are required to be authorized by local ordinance or <br />resolution, are the maximum allowed under DIVCA. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. The City Council could choose not to take any action and allow the City to continue to <br />operate without a DIVCA - compliant ordinance. <br />2. The City Council could direct staff to make other changes to the proposed ordinance. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Overall, the City will see a modest increase in PEG receipts as a result of this change and all <br />PEG funds will continue to fund equipment and facilities used by the City for its PEG <br />programming. This number may also increase to the extent that cable operators providing <br />service to new customers who were not previously subscribers. The City will also avoid the <br />costs of potential legal challenges over the financial and other obligations of current and future <br />cable operators. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />This ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. <br />(Public Resource Code § 21065; Guidelines § 15378) <br />