Laserfiche WebLink
6.3.D. - Page 4 <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY CONFIRMING THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS <br />TO THE REDEVELOPMENT DISSOLUTION OVERSIGHT BOARD <br />WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redwood City ( "City ") approved and <br />adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project No. 2 ( "Redevelopment <br />Plan "), covering certain properties within the City (the "Project Area "); and <br />WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redwood City ( "Agency ") has <br />been engaged in activities to execute and implement the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to <br />the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code § <br />33000, et sec..) ( "CRL "); and <br />WHEREAS, since adoption of the Redevelopment Plan the Agency has undertaken <br />redevelopment projects in the Project Area to eliminate blight, to improve public facilities <br />and infrastructure, to renovate and construct affordable housing, and to enter into <br />partnerships with private industries to create jobs and expand the local economy; and <br />WHEREAS, as part of the 2011 -12 State budget bill, the California Legislature <br />enacted, and the Governor signed , companion bills AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27, requiring that <br />each redevelopment agency be dissolved unless the community that created it enacts an <br />ordinance committing it to making certain payments; and <br />WHEREAS, a Petition for Writ of Mandate was filed in the Supreme Court of the <br />State of California on July 18, 2011 (California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana <br />Matosantos, et a /., Case No. S194861), challenging the constitutionality of AB 1X 26 and <br />AB 1X 27 on behalf of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies; and <br />WHEREAS, on December 29, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its final decision in <br />the aforesaid litigation, upholding AB 1X 26, invalidating AB 1X 27, and extending all <br />statutory deadlines under AB 1X 26, essentially dissolving all redevelopment agencies <br />throughout the State effective February 1, 2012; and <br />WHEREAS, AB 1X 26 provides that successor agencies be designated as <br />successor entities to the former redevelopment agencies, and provides that, with certain <br />exceptions, all authority, rights, powers, duties and obligations previously vested with the <br />former redevelopment agencies, under the CRL, are vested in the successor agencies; and <br />WHEREAS, on January 23, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15164 <br />confirming its election to serve as the successor agency to the former Agency; and <br />ATTY /RESO.2217 /CONFIRMING THE MAYORS APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS TO THE RDA DISSOLUTION OVERSIGHT <br />BOARD <br />REV:03 -09 -12 VR <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />