Laserfiche WebLink
' -�°"��0�� Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo ', <br /> 6.1.B. - Page 5 Hall of Justice and Records <br /> � " 400 Counfy Center <br /> A"r+'��sa%�� Redwood City,CA 94063-1655 <br />� {650)599-1200 ' <br /> COUILT�.7:L�CUTIVB OFPICER PAX(650)3G3-4G98 <br /> C�.BRIC 8c JURY COIVIMISSIONER www.sanrnateocourt.org <br />� �L�L��L�./ <br />' February 15,2012 <br /> ��� � � �a�� <br />� City Couucil CI'FY MANAG�R'�OFFIC� <br /> City of Redwnod City I Y O REi� OD I Y � <br />� 1017 Middlafield�oad ' <br />� Redwood City,CA 94063 <br />� Re: Tl�e Couizty, San Carlos, and Cal Fire,A Missed Opportunity? <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i Dear Councihnenibars: ! <br /> i � <br />, Tl�e 2a11-2012 Grand .Tuiy filed a report on Tebruaiy 15, 2612 which coiltains �'indings and recamzx�ea�dataons <br /> pEx�taining to your agency. Youz age�cy ax�ust submit cammenCs, within 90 days, ta the IIoi1. Gerald J. Bucliwald. <br />; Yauz•age��cy's respozase is due no later than May 15, 2012. Please note that the responsc sl�oYrld indicate th�t i� <br /> was appraved by your governing vody at A public meeting. <br />: For all findirlgs,your resporiding ageney shall indicate one of the following: <br />� 1. The res�o�ident agraes with the finding. <br /> 2. The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with Ehe#"inding, in which case the respanse shall specify � <br /> the poi•Cion of the I"inding that is disputec�and shall i�lclude an explanat�on of the x�asons tlaerefore. � <br />� Addi�azzaIly, as to eacl� Gz�azad Juzy zecoznxmendat�o�a, your responding agei�cy shali zeport one of the rollowing <br />' actions; <br /> 1. TI�e z•ecozninendation has beei�.xmplemented,with a summas•y regarding t11e impleinented actioi�. <br /> 2. The reconunei�dation has not yet baen in7plemented, but r�+ill Ue iiliplemented in ilie futu��e, with a <br /> time fraTne foi•iinplemei�tatioil. ', <br /> 3. The xecorninendation requires fiuther analysis, with aai explanakon and the scope and�ar�n�eters of <br /> an analysis or study, anci a 1�me frame for the malter to be pre}�ared far discussion by tk�e officez ox <br /> director af th�agency ar depa�•tnzeilt veing investigafed or reviewed,includzzxg t��e go�ernrz�g body of <br /> the public agency rrvhen applicable. This time fiame shall not exceed six n�oxiths fi•ozz�. t�.e date of <br /> publication o�llie Graud J�ry report, <br /> 4. Fhe recommei�dation will not be implemented because it is raa# wananted or re�sonable, with an � <br /> explanation 1:herefare. • <br /> � <br />