My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-04-01
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-04-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2016 3:53:11 PM
Creation date
4/11/2002 12:37:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/1/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Feasibility Analysis - City Council "A" List Priorities for Fiscal Years 2002103/04 (Cont.) <br /> {~' :~/~" J~ applications that come to each school. <br /> <br />· Estimated initial cost None to the City. <br /> <br />· Ongoing costs The partners in Redwood City 2020 asked for an estimate of "acting on <br /> thereafter the immediate opportunities" that these facilities provide. They <br /> estimated the cost for lights; heat, building maintenance and custodial <br /> services at between $115,000 and 205,000/year for use of 11 <br /> gym/multipurpose rooms and 12 library/ media centers. Staff costs <br /> were estimated at .75 FTE @ $42,000/year x 11 sites or $346,500/year. <br /> <br /> · Staffing/resource Costs based on assumption of simply having the facilitieS open and <br /> needs supervised after 5:00 p.m. for drop in usage of community members. <br /> <br />· Options/alternatives Select one to two sites in addition to those we are already using for After <br /> School sites and test various staffing and programming scenarios. <br /> Or, allocate each school site to a non-profit to operate. <br /> <br /> Priority #5: Create an Implementation Plan for Downtown <br /> <br />· Assumptions This is a detailed description of how and when we propose to implement <br /> the various recommendations in the Downtown Plan. <br /> <br />· Potential obstacles There are many recommendations in the plan. The scope of the work <br /> will be the biggest challenge. <br /> <br />· Nexus Staff is already working on developing this plan, for implementation In <br /> the 2002-2003 Budget. <br /> <br />· Estimated initial cost The creation of the plan will take staff time. The various recommended <br /> capital improvements will likely only be implementable with funds from a <br /> Redevelopment Agency bond issue. At the urging of the development <br /> community, the Council has agreed to fund a "program" EIR for <br /> Downtown at a cost'of $275,000, to facilitate development consistent <br /> with the draft Downtown Plan. <br /> <br />· Ongoing costs Unknown at this time. <br /> thereafter <br /> <br />· Staffing/resource As one of the first steps in implementing this plan, staff is proposing the <br /> needs hiring of a Downtown Development Manager, someone specifically <br /> dedicated to working on downtown issues. <br /> <br />· Options/alternatives Almost infinite. The implementation program will be recommended by <br /> staff to Council, but the options will depend upon Council action. The <br /> plan is not yet adopted so it is premature to speculate about options. <br /> <br />Priority #6: Advance plannlnft tied to the General Plan updat~- <br /> <br />· Assumptions The Council wishes us to focus more resources on advance planning. <br /> Staff will make a recommendation back to Council on how best to <br /> <br /> 4oflo <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.