Laserfiche WebLink
Feasibility Analysis - City Council "A" List Priorities for Fiscal Years 2002/03104 (Cont.) <br /> <br />· Staffing/resource Whether the fields are developed in synthetic or real turf will impact the <br /> needs number of staff needed to support the area as well as water costs. <br /> <br />· Options/alternatives Look at the development of a combined use field such as Hoover that <br /> would create two soccer and two baseball fields. <br /> <br />Priority #10: Lighting of McGarvey and Garfield School Fields <br /> <br />· Assumption McGarvey Field is currently the only City owned 90-foot diamond <br /> available for baseball. We also have limited use of a 90-foot diamond in <br /> the Pacific Shores Complex and will add one 90-foot field when Garfield <br /> is completed for a total of 3 excluding the high school fields. Lights at <br /> McGarvey and Garfield will allow for longer hours and days of use. <br /> <br />· Potential obstacles We have recently engaged the neighbors of Red Morton Park in <br /> discussions about the skate park and learned that many of them feel <br /> that the park is already getting too much use. They may not be pleased <br /> with additional lighting. There are homes that surround the park that will <br /> have to be considered. <br /> <br />· Nexus Links directly to a previously established priority for increasing play <br /> fields in Redwood City. <br /> <br />· Estimated initial cost We asked a lighting contractor to give us a basic estimate for lighting <br /> McGarvey Field and received a quote of $250,000. No such estimate <br /> has been secured for Garfield. <br /> <br />· Ongoing costs Utility costs are taken out of the Adult Sports Budget. Our costs last <br /> thereafter year were $8,680. Year to date we have expended $7,441. Our budget <br /> for this line item is $12,700. Repairing and changing lights would be an <br /> additional responsibility of staff but would be dealt with by adjusting <br /> other tasks. <br /> <br />· Staffing/resource No significant impacts, although additional duties could cause re- <br /> needs prioritizing of maintenance at other facilities. <br /> <br />· Options/alternatives Add lights at the new Pacific Shores fields, as the location would have <br /> less impact on neighbors. <br /> <br />Priority #11: Child Care Location Investi,qation (Franklin Street alternative) <br /> <br />· Assumption Council has been made aware of the child-care issue and supports the <br /> idea of the City helping to make additional spaces happen. With regard <br /> to Franklin Street, apparently a non-profit developer and a private <br /> foundation were fairly well down the road in planning for a Center in the <br /> Franklin Street Area when it became evident that the site only worked if <br /> the adjacent creek was rerouted through a culvert and the childcare <br /> facility expanded out onto the added space. The costs to culvert the <br /> creek are estimated at about $1,500,000. Since this cost was not <br /> included in the childcare project's original scope and the cost was not <br /> budgeted, Community Development staff is seeking other sites in the <br /> <br /> 7 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />