My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-05-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-05-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2012 3:33:37 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 3:22:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/21/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a, 7.A. - Page 21 <br /> 4. The Financial Assessment <br /> a. Were both sale and lease options provided? <br /> b. Is the offered sale price sufficient to cover all costs of the development for the City, such <br /> as the relocation of the culvert, the creation of Depot Circle, and consultant costs? <br /> c. Which project best addresses the long term fiscal goals of the City? <br /> 5. The Schedule <br /> a. Will the project be completed quickly? <br /> b. Is the project's financing sufficient, committed, and immediately available? <br /> c. Will the project be broken into phases, with only the first phase developed within the <br /> next two to three years; or will it be completed in its entirety within two to three years? <br /> d. Are there committed tenants that are ready to occupy the buildings as soon as they're <br /> completed? <br /> e. Does the schedule achieve an appropriate balance between optimism and realism? <br /> f. Is the developer highly experienced with the proposed uses, the proposed building type, <br /> and operating in a Downtown setting? <br /> 6. Minimization of Construction Impacts <br /> a. Does the proposal include a strategy to maintain viability for neighboring businesses to <br /> the greatest degree possible? <br /> b. Is auto, bike, and pedestrian access maintained in the vicinity of the project to the <br /> greatest degree possible during construction? <br /> c. Is the developer proposing a sufficient public outreach strategy? <br /> d. Does the developer demonstrate a good understanding of the Redwood City community <br /> and its needs? <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.