AgdaPkt 2012-05-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8.A. - Page 14 ATTACHMENT 1 Commission grant approval to projects which they deem to comply fully with those standards and guidelines. The Planning Commission will evaluate the HRAC and staff recommendations in making a decision on the project. � Standards Compliance Only. For projects which the �I-€B I11Y0l��/lY�I10C1!'IY100 p�anning Manager/Designee deems to conform with the standards, but not the guidelines, in addition to seeking a recommendation to the Planning Commission from the HRAC as described above, the rnrnhi�on�i irol R�� mmi��oo /4R('\ Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) or successor committee shall make a recommendation to the DI-IG��iron�nr/flocinn�c Planning Manager/Designee on the acceptability of the aspects of the project which do not conform with the guidelines. Considering the HRAC's and �SAAC's input, and considering whether the aspects of the application which do not conform to the guidelines nonetheless adequately promote the overall intent of the DTPP, the �I€B I11Y0l��/lY�I10C1!'IY100 p�anning Manager/Designee shall make a staff recommendation of the project to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will evaluate the HRAC, �SAAC, and staff recommendations in making a decision on the project. • Lack of Non-Historic Standards Compliance. Projects deemed by the ou�n I11Y0l��/lY�I10C1!'IY100 p�anning Manager/Designee to not comply with the standards in sections 2.2 through 2.10 shall be rejected. � Exceptions to the Historic Resource Preservation Standards. For projects which seek an exemption from the standards of Section 2.1.3, the following additional steps shall be added to the project review process: 1) Findings shall be made that the project site and/or the historic structure itself has unusual physical conditions which warrant the consideration of exceptions, or other constraints which render it infeasible or impractical to fully comply with one or more of the standards; 2) An evaluation shall be undertaken by qualified professionals experienced in the development and review of appropriate design modifications to historic resources to ensure full compliance with all applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards (SIS); and 3) the project shall be reviewed for compliance with CEQA, consistency with Redwood City's General Plan Goals and Policies for historic resources, and consistency with the City's adopted Historic Preservation Ordinance. The n ��p7� Manager/Designee shall then forward the project application to the Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC), which shall review the project application for conformance to the SIS and the goals of the DTPP and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The ATTY/RES0.2237/AMENDING BOOK II OF THE DTPP REV:05-10-12 VR Page 6 of 21