Laserfiche WebLink
-80- <br /> Ar g.A. - Page 169 <br /> consistent with the preceding s#atement are �TOVided in Resolution <br /> #12-17(Environmental Impact Report) and Mitigation, Monitori�g & <br /> Reporting Program attached herein {Attachment 'I} and the Finger <br /> A�enue Nine-Lot Planned Development Profect EIR (pro�ided under <br /> separate co�er). <br /> d. The desigr� and proposed improvements wifl not conflict with essential <br /> public easements for access through, or use af, property wifhin tne <br /> proposed s�bdi�ision. The prolect design and �roposed improvements <br /> wiil meet alf necessary criteria consistent with the abo�e, if and wi�ere <br /> applicable. <br /> e. Exception ta the roadway desig� identifed in Section 3 complies with <br /> requirements for findings descri�ed in Section 30.69, and the tentative <br /> map is deemed workable with the granting of such exception. Findir�gs <br /> consistent with the preceding statement are pro�Eded in Section 3 of <br /> this Resolution. <br /> f. The map design and improvements are consistent with written public <br /> policy and with the public interest. Refer ta Draft EIR pages �73-179 <br /> that describes t�e Project's cor�siste�cy witf� regional and community <br /> planslpolicies. <br /> Section 3. Exception to the City's Prir�ate Roadway Engineering Standard to <br /> allow a 22 foot wide, one-way roadway with a four foo# wide roiled curbl <br /> paver pedestrian pathway raised 3 inches that is incorporated within the 22 <br /> foot dimension wher9e the City engineering standard normally requires a 25- <br /> foot wide, finro-way roadway and a five foot sidewalk. <br /> (a) Consistent with Municipai Code Section 30.�9, the Planning <br /> Commission finds that: <br /> 1. The property is of such shape or size, or is affected by such topagrap�ical <br /> conditior�s, or is subject to such tit�e limitations of record that it is impossible <br /> or impractica�le for the sc�bdivider to comply with #he requiremen# with <br /> which exception is #aken. <br /> As described in Resolution #92-17 (Planned Development) attached herein <br /> (Attachment 2) #he project's 5.3 units/acre density is cor�sistent with the <br /> density standards of the C�ty's General Plan and R-1 zoning district that <br /> allows up to 7 units/acre; howe�er, due to the site's unusual shape and size <br /> it woufd be impractical for the subdivider to comply with the requirements <br /> with which exception is taken. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2255/ATl'ACHMEMT 9 FINGER VESTIIdG TENTATIVE MAP—PC <br /> R�v:06-1a-�2 VR <br /> Page 3 of 18 <br />