My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-07-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-07-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2012 9:27:35 AM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:54:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/9/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
657
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 319 <br /> Statement on Fin er Avenue Aesthatics <br /> I am a Finger Avenue resident or neighbor,w�o walks, bicyaIes or otl�erwise enjoys the <br /> Finger Avenue streetscape. I have seen the pJ�s for the McGowan nine-loi de�elopineni,and <br /> conctude tlaat it will substaniially degrade tl�e existing�visual character and yuality af the site <br /> and its su�raundings. <br /> What is irnporta�nt assthetically abaut my neighborhood is the serr�i-rnral character af the <br /> nortt� side of Finger Avenue, with many hoxnes set far back from t�e street. The appearance of <br /> large anlounts of open space with mature,otd growth�e�s,provides a striking �ackdrop to <br /> the homes. The contrast between the north side of Finger Avenue and its soutlt side,with its <br /> many quaint, early 20�`century bungalows and coitages, is something that's trnique ta <br /> Redwood.City and treasured by its residents. <br /> Examples of how the Finger Avenue Project significantly degrades the aesthetics of our <br /> neighborhood are: <br /> � Constrraction of two hvmes��ith wide two-story facades set back t�ie minimum <br /> a2lowab�e distance�'rom the street, Tl�ere are no hoUSes that large set that clase to the <br /> street anywliere in aur neighborhoad. " <br /> • Nowhere else on Finger Avenae are homes tlYis laige placed on lots this small. <br /> • All of the homes are af simila�•size and a1l two-story, as opposed io the tnix of liome <br /> sizes and heights that are representative of ihe north s�de of Finger Avenue. <br /> � Most of these nine homes wilY be viewable from the public street. There is little open <br /> space and tl�e homes are only set back a small distance fi•om the narrow that serves <br /> them (some from 3ft—6$from the alleyway.) Nowhcre in our neighborhood are <br /> hauses situated in this fashion, <br /> � A deve�opment tliis dense�y packed is incompatible with the ptesence of la��e rnatvre <br /> trees on the site.The eventual loss af these trees wilI be irre�et�sib�e. <br /> • The breakup of the north side of Finger Ave, by creating two new interse.�tions. The <br /> nat��ow alleyway built far t�e development fails to integrate with Finger A�enue by not <br /> laaving a sidewalk or planting strip against the roadway. <br /> • Tne one-way al�eyway wi�l reyuire street signs on Finger A�e ta direct t�'affc, further <br /> campibmising the cha��acter of the�orth side of ihe streei. <br /> The a�+eraJ�mass and scale of this de�e�opment is completely out ofplaGe in our <br /> neighbarhood, out of character for the north side of FingerAven�e and it will only lead to <br /> fiu�ther deg��adsti ls�"uniyue clieracter an a2ity of ow'street. <br /> N ,/ '(/ "� t-.�. <br /> � . <br /> Address � � �l� n/ �ve Date j/( / Z�� � <br /> , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.