My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-07-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-07-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2012 9:27:35 AM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:54:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/9/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
657
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 341 <br /> Statement on �'in er Avenue Aesthetics <br /> I ain a Finger Avenue resident or neiglibor,wha walks, bicycles or ot�ierwise enjoys the <br /> Finger Aven�e streetscape. T have seen the pla�7s fox the McGowar� nine-lot de�velapment, and <br /> conclude that it wil�substantially degrade the existing visual chaiacter and quality oF the site <br /> and its surroundings. <br /> What is itnportant aest��etically about �ny neighbvrhood is the semi-rura! character of the <br /> no��th side of Finger A��ent�e, vvith many homes set far back from the street. The appearar�ce af <br /> large amaunts of open space with mature,old growth trees,provicies a striking backdrop to <br /> the homes.The contrast between the north side of Finger A�enue and its south side, vvith its <br /> many c�uaint, early 20��centuiy bung�lows and cottages,is something tf�at's u�aique to <br /> Redwood City and trsasured by its residents. <br /> Exan�ples of how the Finger Avenue Piraject sigrufcant�y degrades the aestl�etics of a�ar <br /> neighborhood a��e; <br /> • Canstruction of two homes with wide two-stoiy facades set back the rninimum <br /> aLlowable distance from tt�e street. There arE no hauses tliat large set that close to the <br /> street anywhere in aur neighborhood " <br /> • Nowhere etse on Fir�ger Avenne are homes t12is large placed on lots tl�is small. <br /> • All of the �omes are of siniilar siz�and all two-story,as opposed to t��e mix of home <br /> sizes and heights that are representative of the north side af Finger Avenue. <br /> • Mast of these r�ine hornes will be viewable from the public street. There is little open <br /> space and the homes are only set back a small distance firom the naribw that serves <br /> them (some from 3ft—6f� from tha alleyway.) Nowhere in our neighboriiood are <br /> houses situated in this fashion. <br /> • A develogment this densely packsd is incompatible with the presence oflarge mature <br /> trees on the site. The eventuai lass of these h•ees will be u�reversible. <br /> • The�reakup of the no3�th side of Finger Ave, by creating two new interseetions. The <br /> nan'ow a2leyway built for the developrneni fails to integrate with Finger Avenue by not <br /> t�avi��ag a sidewalk or ptanting strip against the roadway. <br /> • The one-way al�eyway wi11 require sheet signs on Finger Ave to direct traffic,further <br /> compramising the character of the north side of the street. <br /> The overall mass axad scale af this develqpment is compl�tely out of place in p�ar <br /> neighborhood, out af character fnr tlie noi�th side of�`inger Avenue and it wi�l only tead to <br /> fitrther degradation of the►u�ique character and quality of our st�eet. <br /> ,-� . <br /> Natne �. ` <br /> Address !��?, Date (� (�,� ,�0 j <br /> �a� Ct��s� ('� � ��t�-o � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.