My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-07-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-07-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2012 9:27:35 AM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:54:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/9/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
657
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.E. - Page 22 <br /> Taft <br /> Community school programs reached 80% of Taft students in 2010-11. About 54% of students <br /> participated in extended learning for an average of over 90 days of attendance for participants (Exhibit <br /> 10a). Extended learning participants included the highest rate of FRPL participants of any program <br /> category at 84%but a slightly lower rate of English learner students at 74%. Family engagement <br /> programs reached 40%of students at Taft in 2010-11, with parent education programs having the <br /> highest level of participation among family engagement programs at 28%of enrolled students and <br /> average attendance of 16 days through the school year. Participants in family engagement had <br /> generally similar characteristics to participants in other strategy areas. Over 51% of the students at Taft <br /> accessed support services, and these students were about 76%FRPL recipients and 78% English <br /> learners. Students with no program participation were more likely to be male, less likely to receive <br /> FRPL, and had slightly higher 2009-10 CST proficiency rates compared to program participants. <br /> Exhibit 10a: Program Participation and Participant Characteristics at Taft,2010-11 <br /> Participation Participant Characteristics <br /> ELA Math <br /> Avg Free/Red. Parents English Proficient Proficient <br /> %Part. Days Male Female Lunch no HS Learner 2009-10 2009-10 <br /> Extended Learning 54.4% 91.1 45.8% 54.2% 84.0% 44.6% 74.2% 39.4% 65.0% <br /> After School 49.6% 155.1 45.9% 54.1% 85.5% 47.0% 74.7% 38.2% 64.7% <br /> Summer/Intercession 7.9% 0.0 44.7% 55.3% 76.6% 38.3% 85.1% 22.2% 44.4% <br /> Youth Leadership 4.0% * 62.5% 37.5% 91.7% 41.7% 62.5% 37.5% 70.8% <br /> Family Engagement 40.0% 21.6 51.0% 49.0% 73.2% 46.0% 80.8% 39.6% 68.9% <br /> Parent Leadership 6.4% 9.5 39.5% 60.5% 73.7% 44.7% 81.6% 61.5% 84.6% <br /> Parent Education 27.5% 15.9 50.0% 50.0% 73.2% 46.3% 82.3% 44.1% 72.1% <br /> School-Home Communication 15.2% 9.9 46.2% 53.8% 74.7% 48.4% 81.3% 42.9% 69.0% <br /> Parent Events 15.4% 1.4 47.8% 52.2% 63.0% 37.0% 78.3% 50.0% 68.8% <br /> Parent Volunteerism 15.1% 13.0 50.0% 50.0% 82.2% 51.1% 80.0% 41.3% 73.9% <br /> Support 51.4% * 48.5% 51.5% 75.9% 44.6% 78.2% 39.4% 65.2% <br /> Counseling 23.5% * 49.3% 50.7% 76.4% 45.7% 77.9% 40.6% 57.8% <br /> Family Assistance 39.2% * 49.6% 50.4% 74.4% 45.7% 79.5% 37.0% 68.2% <br /> No Program Participation 20.4% * 53.3% 46.7% 40.2% 24.6% 73.0% 46.7% 70.0% <br /> *Note:Daily attendance data were not available for these categories. <br /> Among after school survey participants, Exhibit 10b:After School Survey at Taft,2011 <br /> (who were mostly students with high <br /> program participation), 74% of after school Challenge 64% <br /> participants reported feeling cared for in <br /> their after school programs and 85% Confidence 85% <br /> reported that staff use practices that <br /> promote mutual respect. Similarly, about Mutual Respect 85% <br /> 85%reported feeling confident in their <br /> abilities in the after school program and 64% Sense of Care 74% <br /> reported that staff challenged them to think <br /> about their work (Exhibit 10b). 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% <br /> Redwood City Community Schools Evaluation:2010-11 Evaluation Report Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.