Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Co <br />#4 0 D.33 <br />Redwood <br />April 25, 2003 <br />IV cainfata i Ro ger Flores <br />g <br />549 Palomar Drive <br />Redwood City, CA 94062 <br />RE: 3738 Laurel Way <br />COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Flores, <br />SERVICES The City of Redwood City Plan Review Committee (PRC) met April 22, 2003 <br />to review your submittal for an Architectural Permit for a new 4,018 square <br />foot single family home on a vacant 9,713 square foot parcel. The property <br />PLANNING & is located in the Residential Hillside (RH) Zoning District. The PRC and <br />PE-DEVELOPMENT Plannin7 staff conducted a site visit and discussed various aspects of your <br />application. <br />=1 easy _ai; me if you have an questions about the city Courncil s policy for <br />..t �n .. �1.� r t- X l r. <br />: V CityI II-11L Vl l "CA UI �l YYQ)' anu / VI the • IL1 IQI: r\e VIeV%t <br />�m -�i mil <br />JII i- <br />III' <br />=n?ineering and Construction Services Manager <br />?fanning Services Manager <br />The PRC group and the Zoning Administrator have determined that the <br />1L'i� fVliddlelield <br />, <br />application is not complete, nor does the proposed development conform to <br />RU. Box 391 <br />a significant number of City Standards. However, those issues are not <br />sp in this fetter since the most fundamental deficiency in <br />^emdooli Citti, <br />a ddressed <br />your application is that you have not submitted an Environmental Impact <br />PAoort (=IR) Du to City Council policy established in !988 with <br />amenomen *_s in 2000. As you are aware, Laurel Way is significantly <br />_ <br />s'.:ostandard; utilities are not readily available to many parcels fronting on <br />_aurel Way; and the remaining vacant parcels on Laurel Way (including 3738 <br />-cure; Way-; nave significant slopes, may contain unstable soils, and are <br />w tr! Fla 'i- ve-- {or l anu i`lo�l�a`_ lil fud i lell - �a'_c dl, Creep, <br />and many others, require thorough review througn the <br />arlaiyss included in an =IP.. It is the Zoning Administrator`s opinion that <br />~urtne~ sta` review o` this projec cannot be made without submittal of an <br />=1 easy _ai; me if you have an questions about the city Courncil s policy for <br />..t �n .. �1.� r t- X l r. <br />: V CityI II-11L Vl l "CA UI �l YYQ)' anu / VI the • IL1 IQI: r\e VIeV%t <br />�m -�i mil <br />JII i- <br />III' <br />=n?ineering and Construction Services Manager <br />?fanning Services Manager <br />