Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br />Table 3. Summary Results - Tier li <br />65-15 <br />87.1% 1 87.2% 1 87.9% 1 87.5% 1 96.3% 1 82.9% 1 89.0% <br />59.4% 58.2% 66.9% 57.4% 1 51.8% 1 53.8% 1 65.9% <br />34.8% 40.5% 28.9% 35.2% 1 47.0% 1 39.2% 1 28.8% <br />VONVISornewhat Saddled 77.9% 1 75.6% 1 83.3% 1 79.6% 1 77.0% 704% 1 91.1% <br />V Dipads 19.0% 1 23.2% i_ 15.3% 1 16.7% 1 21.7% 27.0% 1 7.6% <br />,�F. '.. <v nai SAdd sd 76.0% 1 78.7% 1 77.5% 1 72.7% 1 82.2% 1 65.8% 1 88.6% <br />" "V4aiwxhdDl�a6slbdl 176% J 1 20.7% 1. 18.9% 1 19.9% 1 13.9% 1 20.0% 1 7.1% <br />Vervftmewhet Seds8edl 60.6% 1 65.0% 78.9% 1 56.5% 1 57.2% 514% 1 64.6% <br />ry,/?nmewhwrl Okgatisfietli, 26.3% 1 250°% 141% 1 30.9% 1 X54% 326% 1 191% <br />Verv/Swra hat Satisfied 75.1% 1 71.2% 1 89.0% 1 67 9% 1 773% 1 75.6% 1 88.4% <br />VerviSmnewhat Dissatisfied 20.1% 1 20.9% 1 $A% 1 28.2% 1, 18.9% 1 214% 1 4.8% <br />VsrVl3ontewllat Satisfied <br />853% <br />1 72.7% 1 <br />86.5% 1 <br />865% 1 96.2% 1 84.6% 1 90.0% <br />Very/Somewhat D'issaddedl <br />13.2% <br />1 25.2% 1 <br />12.5% 1 <br />12.2% 1 38% 1 154% I 4.1% <br />ABordede housinal <br />14.9% <br />1 14.5% 1 <br />16.2% 1 <br />17.0% 1 20.2% 1 112% 1 14.2% <br />' Que9ty of educe" <br />10.2% <br />4.6% 1 <br />12.2% 1 <br />12.8% 1 5.0% 1 131% <br />9.6% <br />C4mmurycation between C�� 6I <br />� <br />6.5% <br />4.2% I <br />1.7% I <br />5.7% <br />I 1.5% <br />I 104% <br />8.3% <br />p <br />6.9% <br />9.0% <br />8.9% <br />37% <br />5.7% <br />4.7% <br />8.9% <br />Redudne traf is ommdon <br />6 1 % <br />6.6% 1 <br />1.8% 1 <br />5.8% <br />1 88% <br />1 6.3% <br />7.5% <br />Table 3 through 7 summarize the survey results across each of the 6 area seg- <br />ments. For ease of presentation we have indicted the areas by number in the <br />table. The legend is repeated following each tier. <br />'Legend for Geographic Areas is on next page. <br />City of Redwood City <br />Godbe Rward <br />Page 15 <br />