My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2012 5:16:54 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 4:57:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
9/10/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
900
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.4.A. - Page 3 <br /> Change the text which tells As written this is very proscriptive and has caused <br /> developers when/how they must confusion. Also, it does not reflect how we need to deal <br /> widen their sidewalks. with this situation for most projects, which is on a case-by- <br /> case basis. On Page 62 of the Plan, in Section 2.4.2-A-1- <br /> d, there is already a provision that allows us to determine <br /> this on a case-by-case basis anyway, so we should <br /> eliminate any confusion. Every condition is unique and it is <br /> too difficult to create a formula that works for every <br /> situation. <br /> Call out sign permits as a separate It has caused confusion to apply for a "Planned <br /> permit type. Community Permit" for a sign only. Also, as written we are <br /> required to take a $5,000 deposit for signs, which is <br /> unreasonable. This does not alter the review process,. <br /> Change name of"Conditional Uses" It has caused confusion to have the word "conditional" <br /> use group to "Restricted Uses". refer to a use group and as a type of permission. <br /> In the Corner Store use group, Many prospective business owners think they may fall <br /> specify what is meant by "cafe". under this designation, and have asked what it means. <br /> Since their approval in the orange zone depends on <br /> whether or not they are considered to be a cafe, a clear <br /> definition is needed. <br /> Make it clear that pre-existing retail In order to bolster the Broadway retail core, new retail <br /> buildings on EI Camino are allowed buildings aren't allowed on most of EI Camino within the <br /> to remain in use as retail, even when Plan. However, many of the existing buildings were <br /> tenants change. designed for retail. This change would allow new retail <br /> uses to go into spaces/buildings that were designed and <br /> historically used for retail. <br /> Reflect the new name of the The name of the committee has changed. <br /> Architectural Advisory Committee. <br /> Remove references to PHED This position no longer exists. <br /> Director. <br /> Delete the "Sidewalk Width These rows have caused confusion and are unnecessary. <br /> Provision" rows from the Public All of their content can be found in the text. <br /> Frontage table. <br /> Clearly state that other than Building This will not actually change the regulations, but will make <br /> ID signs, no signage is allowed on them much easier to understand for staff and applicants. <br /> the 2nd floor or above. Presently, this rule is hard to find as it is only located in the <br /> Signage Regulations Chart legend. <br /> Move general Private Frontage Type Due to being embedded in the intro text, these rules are <br /> rules from the intro of Section 2.8.4 to difficult to identify. <br /> their own section called "2.8.3-F <br /> General Private Frontage <br /> Regulations". <br /> Allow"Common Entry" frontage to be The original Plan inadvertently limited this to upper floor <br /> used for upper floor and/or ground uses, but it is also an appropriate way to access ground <br /> floor uses. floor uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.