My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2012 5:16:54 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 4:57:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
9/10/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
900
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 143 <br /> ATTACHMENT2 <br /> 2. Lot 8 -4.41' where 20' is requi�ed <br /> 3. Lot 9 � 6.7' ta 44' where 20' is required <br /> b. Front yard setback for Lot 6 of 7' #0 14' where 15' is required <br /> (for Lot 6's enclosed porch) <br /> c. Private street-facing sid� yard setback: <br /> 1. Lat 6 - 5' ta 13' where 15' is req�aired <br /> 2. Lot 7 - 6' and 8" where �5' is required <br /> Garages: <br /> a. Front yard setback for Lot 1 af �9' where 20' is required <br /> b. Side yard setback: <br /> �. Lat 1 - 3' where 6' is required <br /> 2. Lot 3 - 4' where 6' is required <br /> 4. Lat 7 - 3' where 6' is required <br /> c. Rear yard se#back for Laf T (d�tached garage} of 3' where 6' <br /> is required. <br /> Setback modifications are all internal to the project si#e and so will <br /> not be readily visible from the public right-of-way with the exception <br /> of the Lot 7 residence that would have a private street facing side <br /> yard setback of 6' & �0" where �5' is normally required. This <br /> setback modification will allow the praposed resicl�nce to frame the <br /> private roadway, creatin� a more desirable streetscape aesthetic, <br /> while pro�iding greater distance Iprivacy (15' setback where 6' is <br /> the standard) between the proposed residence and the existing <br /> neighboring property. <br /> Lots 5, 8 & 9 would have setbacks ranging from 6 to 14'. These fots <br /> abut neighbaring properties along their side yards where similarl <br /> compatible 6 foot side yard setbacks are required of the <br /> neighbaring properties. <br /> Garage setback modificatians (that are 3' and 4' where 6' is the <br /> standard) will ali meet minimum �ire safety codes. The reduced <br /> setbacks for these smaller residential structures wauld also help ta <br /> minimize the use af tfie setback areas far outside storage. <br /> (c) The City Council hereby finds that the proposed develapment, <br /> including the proposed modifications to Artic�e 5 and Article 32, Section <br /> 32.2, zoning standards described abo�e, will provide an en�iranment <br /> of physical and functional desirability, in harmony with the character of <br /> the surrounding neighborhoad, as r�quired by Zoning Ordinance <br /> Article 46. <br /> ATTYIR�S0.22631APPROVING A PLANN�D DEVELpPMENT PERMIT(FINGER AVE) <br /> REV:07-02-12 VR <br /> Page 6 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.