|
8.A. - Page 181 "�'
<br /> Pfar�ned Developmgnt(Article 4fi) NFadr�rcation Request
<br /> T�e appficant has applied for a P�anned Deve�opment Perm�t and requests
<br /> madifrcations to R-1 (Article 5) zonir�g standards relevar�t to Icat c,�verage, lo# s�ze for
<br /> slopfig lots and building sefbacks as provided belaw:
<br /> • �ot Cvvarage: Tho R-1 zoning dist�ict �Ilow� 40% 1ot cov�rage. Lof �oyerag�e �s
<br /> normally calculated usi�g net larrd srea, whlch v�nould exclud� ths cre�k chanr�el
<br /> (nor�h�m creefc propew#y I�ne of Lots 1-�} ��c� �he priv��e ro�dway. As sf�owm
<br /> below, excluding the creek �rea to determine lot aod�rage for Lots 1-4 wwou�d re�ui4
<br /> in Lot 3 exceeding �hs R�1 lot coverage star�dard by p,9% as sho�nm irt columrt fo�rr
<br /> �aelow. Howsver, if the cree� area is incle�ded �n tha lor caverago determination,
<br /> �h�n Lo#s 1-� would alf ineet the R-1 lot cover�ge standard, as showr� irt column
<br /> f"rv� belo�+. As ex�lained above, hawrever, the PD ordinance alfoi,ys the �tannir�g
<br /> Gommi�sion to �nodify ths R-1 fot coverage standard ar�d approv� proj�cts that
<br /> exceed 40% lot cov�rage, sp tha� regardlssS of how lot Coverage l� calculated, the
<br /> proj�ct complies wit� the zoning ordin�r�GO requir�me�ts.
<br /> �o�,Arer, I.at Area Loc(buird€ng) �.ot coyerag� X �oc cav�raae °,�
<br /> (Exclsrdtng priv�t� lExcluc�ln� covera�a are� cl C�:r�� Zn� c��Cr,�e:c
<br /> r+v�dway(9.41 �a.j) thoCroak
<br /> Lot 1 -8,294 8,C�5 2�4i� 36.5 29.+i%
<br /> Lot 2-7.437 5,149 1,�p �g.5 �,fi�
<br /> Lot 3-7,515 8,099 2,495 4D,9(�55 sq. i�t.j 33.2°�
<br /> Lo#d-7,596 6,898 2,6Q6 37.4 33.0%
<br /> ■ �ot Size far Slo{�ir�g Lats 7-3: The R-1 zonir�g dis�rict requires lot sizes of 6,OQ0 sc�.
<br /> ft. After subtracting out thc� area devoted to the private roadway, the remai�ir►g
<br /> P�oject area (1.41 acres) is proposed ko be subdivided ir�to �rine f�ts, ranging i� sizc�
<br /> from B,Q00 to 8,214 sq.ft. Hovrever, per Zanin� Orclinanc� Article 32.2, �of� 1-4
<br /> atso requfre lar��� lot sizes b�cause the slope of these parcels is gr�ater �han 5
<br /> percent. �Is iliustraf�d in Tables 9 befaw, the minimum �at size rec�uirem�r�t for I�ots
<br /> 7-4 is increased clue to the sfoping bantc af Cardiller�s �r�e�r� (f�rticie 32,2).
<br /> T�t�l�a '�: a�� 1�mBr����Lo"��r�+a �et��l�arr9�n�gc�r���.�i��;�
<br /> !_ot ►�,v�. �.ot �.aG��� ���o��:�l�rc��s
<br /> �lop� (pLr farrE��:� �,tsk�i��
<br /> 5�.�
<br /> 9 '��9� �,��3 S��f4
<br /> 3 15�/o i�,��(1� 7�+�37
<br /> � `13% +-`�w,�DC] 7,545
<br /> �F 7% 1,40p 7,596
<br /> 5 �ess than 5°� 6,000 6,334
<br /> S Less than�°10 6,000 6,24�
<br /> T Less than 5°� 3,OpQ G,000
<br /> 8 Less t�an 59b 8,000 B4ODO
<br /> 9 Less than 5°� 6,000 6,'�38
<br /> Under this scenario, �ots 1- 3 wooulcl nc�t mesf Yhe minimum lot size requfremen# of
<br /> Zon�ng Ordinartce Ar#icle 32.�, Hovvever, none of the Project parcels woutd trigger
<br /> 4
<br />
|