AgdaPkt 2012-09-10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�7- 8.A. - Page 184 pianting for ILot 3 arosian con#rol), ar�d DEIR SecPion 2.2 Hydr-olog� and N�/ater Quality exp(air�s hov� the Proj�ct's stv�rnw��r �Facili#ies �uld prev�ent dis��ar�� of pallutan�s direatly to Cordifleras Creek. Re�er�o PD Resolu�ion far additionaJ findings. Tentativ�hriap-Su$division Qrdir�ance Private Roadv�ay Design Exce�tion Requas� As part o� the Vesting '�'e�tative �ilap app�ication, the �pplicant a�sa requasts an e�c�p�ion �n the Ci#�'s �,ro-�ay, 25-fioaf auide prrvate roadw�y rwith frve foot si�dawafk engineering standard. 11�uni�ipa! Code Chapte� 3Q (Subdf�isions� S�c�ion 30.�18 B allor��s roadway width �xceptians under a Plan�ed Developmen� {PD} or i�tfie exce{�tion is in thc p�a�o�ic ir�terest. As part nf th� �D appiication, the applicant proposa� a pridate one-uvay roadway at 2�-�Feet fn 4vidth wi�t�r a four�ot wide colied curbf pa�er pedestripn pafihway raised 3 i�c�es ti�at is inr..rarporated wi#h�n the 22 foot dimsn�Pon. �Th� Gity's Plar� Revi�w Corr�mitts�, �ncic�ding #he Fire De,par�men� ar,d eity Traffic Engi�eer, has determined that #�ie propc,sed roadway maets ��er�ency ��ia�e (pubfic safety} ac�ess and ov�e�alf c�rculat�on r�eeds of the Projec�. The roadway is not necessary for ne#r�hborhoad or ger�eral aifi,n�vid� circ�ttla�tion nesds; rather it fs a �rfvate raau�ray intended �v senre only nine pro�erty or�nsrs �tnd thei� guest�, T�� roadwa� i� th�s consid�red propo�tic�nally sized to t�ri� small n�ne ur�it infill dedelapment (vs. 25 foot Yrfs�e, tr�ro�v✓ay privat� ro�dway� th�t �erve a nefiwor� of neighborh�ad �treeis fivr larger tfevelopments Y�at gent;r�te greater vehicfe derrrand/�ra�`ic volurn�:s s�ch as t�te 25 foot wi�e roadways fo�nd in Redwaod Shares). �t�f�r to Vesting Tentattve Ma� Resolut+on fioi•addFt�on�l findings. The Projsct, a� describad abave and b�(oyv, i�rcorporate� RrQj�c� rc�nemer�tis mad� �y the �pplPc�nt in respans� to C�fiy Gounci! lnpur pro�#d�d at tha �lugusti 3, 2Qp9 C�}r Council �ear�ng. The Project re�inemsnt� as summarized be�ow were p�es�nted ta fihe City Gauncif at the Qc�abgr 26, 20Q8 public hearin� and wsre anat�rzed i� the Draft EIFt, "i. S4am�t�rat�r Creek 5etbac�C: � Cauncil input� �onsider inc�eas9�g [.ats 1-4 re�id�n�i�l setba�c�s rrom �rop of cr�ek b�r�k. The Council s�gc�es�ed that tl�� ch�ng� n�ed not incit�t�� ar� r�djus#ment #o a 25 foot minim�r� $e�b�ck, but fh�t more t�tan 'f 6 ��e# �vould bs a�t improv�r�ent th�y w�re loo�Cing for. � /��licsn� response- Tiae setbac� fiar Lot 2 ir�creased �rom � fee� �a 98 feet, Lo�3 �-orr` 10 to 20 fe�t, an,d Lot 4 from 7 ta 20 feet. 2. �ro}ac� Bulkl�+las�lDens€�y: i Courcil inpc�t- Facus on spaciausn3ss in th� Pro�ect d�sign �na r�o# sp�cFr�cally on open spac�. No ��ecific dlrection v�a� prov�led; howe��r, the foltowfng wers met�tioned as possib�e ways ta addr�� th� iss��: r�d�action of harn� �iz��, ��igh#s, nurnber o�f uni#�and i�crease spaca batv�aen ��di�gs. + �ppffcan� resport�o- #�o�s$� on Lots 2, 3, �, �', �nd 8 v�ere r�duced in sixa by 895 sq.�#. in #he �ggrega�e wit� assvciaf� fncreases in �et�ac�. �.o� � and 7 horr�es previgc�s�y �xc��ded �0% Iot cova��age and ar� now �ander �Q% fot carr�tage. �.ot 9's hame was recfuc�d ir� hei�ht t�y on� faot. All residences �rc� 23 fie�t or less in f�sight (p$r 2oni�g Ordlr�ance ArtPde �j. �