Laserfiche WebLink
"�3' 8.A. - Page 240 <br /> ATT�CFE�3ilEfdT� <br /> 2. The proposed use is oamp�tible wifih surroundin� ���s, Th� <br /> F'raject si#e is Ivcated ir� arr �xisting R-'1 {sir�gle-family resid�ntpal) district <br /> th�t cor�tains single �amily homes and �+ill be devel�ped with r�aw sin�la <br /> �amily reside�ces. Ref�er to June 7a, 2Q?2 Plannir�g Cvrnr�issfan staff <br /> repor� and 5ectiar� 2 �bove fior a �fescriptior� of the P�-oJect's aonsisfency <br /> w��f� surroundir�� u��s. <br /> 3. The usc �rr�d �s assac�at�d struct�res and faciliti�� �ri�f not <br /> be d�tr�menf�,! #a the public f�eal�h or safe�y, tF�e g�n�ral wel�are, or #�e <br /> env�ror�ment. The Project site i�seff is curre�tly develo�ed with impervicaus <br /> i�mprovements directly adjacent tq �oMiileras Creek, mciudfng <br /> approxirnatefy 4,888 sq. �t. of impervio�s �ur�aces (�fnactures, pavin� e�c.) <br /> witf�in 25 feet of ti�e �ap of b�r�k (S� Fin�er �IR Figure 2.2-g}. <br /> Consequently, w�Ple th� F'roject w►ould alNa�r ap�roxirna��#y 717 �qua`e <br /> ���� of e�cro�chm�nt r�rit�in th� 25 fvot s�tback area, �he propo,ed <br /> encroachment repr�e�ent� �n w�proa•imat�iy 83% imprpvem�n# o�er the <br /> Proje�# sifie's existing baseline condi#iorr, <br /> 4. Th� use and facili�l�s will na4 adversely affiect or conflic# with <br /> adj�cent uses vr imped� the r�ormal d�velo�men#�f suc�t�o�Rding property, <br /> EViany existing hames �Iorag Corctilleras Creek in f�e v�cirrity ot t�e projec# <br /> site da not maintain G 25 foot s��back to tap of bank o� Cordilleras Creek, <br /> so the propased F'roject would nat be inconsisten�with the �xisting pattern <br /> ofi residenti�l d�ve�opment <br /> 5. Adequata ptsblic and p�iv�4e��cilities such �s utilitiss, <br /> land�caping, �ar�ti�g sp�ce� �rtd traf�ic circ�rl��ion me�st�r�s are or wil! b� <br /> pravidec� for th� �ropos�d usr�. �efier #v Jun� 1�, 2p12 Plar�ning <br /> Gor��ission s��ff repor�, Scctia� 2 above ar�d fhe Fing�r Project �IR <br /> traffic cha�t�r for � description of ��4 adequacy vfi public and pr�v��e <br /> fa�ilities for the propo�d Project. <br /> Sectian 6. ����i���� � ���,r�� �:a��•°���� 1�n��,y�e���� �����rd: r�� <br /> �I��€�:�n� �or�����=����� ����ad, ���r�ti: <br /> (�} Niu�ici��l Cade ChapYer 30 t5u�divisions) S�ct�on 30.��� E� aflowr <br /> roa�way widt� excepti�n� � a �'Iar��ed ��vetnpmer�� (�D) Per�nit has <br /> b�� �p�roved or if�he e�c�ptian is �r� the pubric int�rest. <br /> (b} 7'he pro�ased raadway meet� �rn��gency �r�hicle (p�ablic safety) <br /> acc�:�s anr� g�nera! circulat�on needs of the project. T�e City Traffic <br /> Engin��r has also review�d #h� Ri{H Enc�in�ers at�d F�h; � Peers <br /> traific r��arts �nd m�rnas (Fin�er Dr�� EIR A�p��d�x G� and agree� <br /> tf��# 4�e �rapos�d 22 f�ot wide �riv�te ro�d�way wil! m��t necxssar�� <br /> �:cce�s ar�d circa�latior� n,�ads o€tf�e project. <br /> ATTY/R�S0.72,54/A'TTACHRti�NT 2 FIfJGER Pl.RNItiIEp pEVELOPYI$NT—PC <br /> RE1/:OB-14-12 VR <br /> Paga 7 of 21 <br />