Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 259 -$�- <br /> ATi'qC#i�4ER1T 3 <br /> with mitigation rneasures, w+i11 nQt cre�fe sic�nificant �nvirQr�men#al impact.s. <br /> The Plan Revi�w Commi�tee h�s also determined that the raadw�y mee#s <br /> emergency �ehicle (public safety) and gener�l circulation acrr�ss needs. <br /> The roadway exceptian wil! also not be injurious to ��her praperty ir� th� <br /> vicinity bccause its design is pr�aportionally sized to the small, nine-unit, inftll <br /> residentia( develo�m�nt r�ther 4han over sized! e�cess�ve for i�s intended <br /> purpase. <br /> Vllith #I�is exception, t�e subdivfder w�ll be able to design a better subdivision <br /> {lar�er lots, incr�ased setbacks, less impervious sur�aces, mor� on-sit� <br /> trees saded, simpliffedlsaf�r Yraffic �attern with the or�e-way roadway <br /> config�rr�tion that will include mark�d paver�ent for pecdes�r�ar�s and trafFic <br /> calming) and other impro�emer�t� that should not be detnimentaf to fhe <br /> public rvelfa� ar�njurisau� to properties ir� the vicfni�. <br /> ��) ����i�i�a��y Pr����� ��ur�B,E��I Cr��� ����is�� 3�I.'�'�8 �, t�� �f�r�r���� <br /> f�ar��r�@�sW�� ���� f����: <br /> 1. il�unicipal Code C#�ap#er 3� (�u�divisio�s} Section 30.118 S a11�v�rs <br /> roadway width exceptior�s if a Plan�ed Devefr�pmen# (PD) Permit has <br /> �een approved or if the exr.eption is in the public i�t�rest. <br /> 2. The prvposed roadv�ay mee#s smerg��cy vehicle (�ublic safety} <br /> access a�d gen�ra! c+rculat+ort needs of th� pralect. ��he City Tra�fiic <br /> Er►gineer has afsa reviewed t�e RKH Engine�rs �nd Fehr & Fee� <br /> #r�ffic r�por�s arid mema� (Fir+ger Draft EIR Appendix G) a�d �grees <br /> 4hat th� proAosed 22 faot wid� privafie roadway will m�t �ec�ss�ry <br /> access and �irculat�on �e�ds of tl�e {�roject. <br /> 3, TiiB �oadVUay is not P�eCesSSry �G� nelgi�bO�oc3d or genB��l GityyWitie <br /> circufation needs, rath�r i# is a priv�te ro��wa�y ir�Yended ta serv� on�y <br /> nine property ov,mers �nd thefr gu����. Ti�e roadway 'ts #hus co�sider�ed <br /> pr�partional�y sized to this small nirra u�it �r��rll d�velopment. By <br /> contrast, mosf R�waod Shor�s proj�cts have 25 fc�t vvide, two-way <br /> priy�t� roadways b�c�us� they ��rv� �� a netwaNc of neighborhaod <br /> street� for larger de�elapn�ents tha# g�nerate great�r vehicle demand! <br /> ���IC VQ�UI'�85, <br /> �. "f'he P�Qj�ct is in th� pt�blic i�'rter�st as it is txmsist�n� wifi� �:gional �nd <br /> community planslpn�Pces outlineci in the Finge� Proj�ct Draft �i�, <br /> pag�s ��3-�'79. <br /> Section 4. Ths Plann�ng Commiss�vn recarnmes�ds th�t tt�� City Council <br /> anndi4ionally graRt ti�e exception fa fhe Cify'� �ro-way, 2� foat vvide ��ivate <br /> ro�dway with fi�e �aot side►nvalk engPr�eering standard and cc�nditionalfy a��ro�e <br /> the Vesting Ten#afive ��p �ased o� t�re Planning Commissian's cansider�ior� <br /> AT7Y/RES0.2255lATTACHIViENT 1 FIN('aER 1/�ST#fVG'TEPITATNE NWP—pC <br /> R�11:06-9a-12 VR <br /> Page�oi 1�3 <br />