My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res12 15209
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Res12 15209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2012 9:53:07 AM
Creation date
9/17/2012 9:53:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
9/10/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
09/10/2012 <br /> • Lack of Non-Historic Standards Compliance. Projects deemed by <br /> the �u�n I Ilr'�/��AY�1 ,�CIPIYI�� p�anning Manager/Designee to not <br /> comply with the standards in sections 2.2 through 2.10 shall be <br /> rejected. <br /> • Exceptions to the Historic Resource Preservation Standards. For <br /> projects which seek an exemption from the standards of Section <br /> 2.1.3, the following additional steps shall be added to the project <br /> review process: 1) Findings shall be made that the project site <br /> and/or the historic structure itself has unusual physical conditions <br /> which warrant the consideration of exceptions, or other constraints <br /> which render it infeasible or impractical to fully comply with one or <br /> more of the standards; 2) An evaluation shall be undertaken by <br /> qualified professionals experienced in the development and review <br /> of appropriate design modifications to historic resources to ensure <br /> full compliance with all applicable Secretary of the Interior's <br /> Standards (SIS); and 3) the project shall be reviewed for <br /> compliance with CEQA, consistency with Redwood City's General <br /> Plan Goals and Policies for historic resources, and consistency with <br /> the City's adopted Historic Preservation Ordinance. The �#€9 <br /> n1Y�/�+AYII I�G�IA►1GG planning Manager/Designee shall then forward <br /> the project application to the Historic Resources Advisory <br /> Committee (HRAC), which shall review the project application for <br /> conformance to the SIS and the goals of the DTPP and make a <br /> recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Planning <br /> Commission will evaluate the HRAC and staff recommendations in <br /> making a decision on the project. <br /> b. Type of Approval. Applications approved by Planning Commission <br /> shall be granted a Planned Community (PC) Permit. The PC permit <br /> shall be in the form of a letter Notice of Official Action (NOA) that will <br /> contain the approvals and the conditions of approval. <br /> c. Appeal. Any aggrieved person or party may appeal the decision of the <br /> Planning Commission <br /> °�+°r +"° ,�°^;�;^^. In accordance with the provisions set forth in <br /> Article 48 of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> is-�i�al� <br /> �����r�iro�inn nf c��_���rlo�����a�icinn h�i �ho <br /> r � <br /> i • <br /> ATTY/RES0.2269/RESOLUTION FOR AMENDMENT TO DTPP RESO.#15209 <br /> REV:08-14-12 PT MUFF#613 <br /> Page 6 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.