Laserfiche WebLink
�9�4p°�`t°fc,� Superiar Court of California, County of San Mateo <br /> � �'� Hall of 7ustice and Records 6.1.A. - Page 8 <br /> �. �. 0' 444 County Center <br /> oB�a,s�r+� Redwood City, CA 94063-1655 <br /> (�so)s99-t20o <br /> COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICER __ . „ ,_, _,_ __._,_ „ FAX(650)363-4698 <br /> ?� � � www.sanmateocourt.or <br /> CLERK&JURY COMMISSI�NER , g <br /> � �g '� ` � C <br /> 7 � ��� �a ,!�.,. e �� �F�_;� � <br /> �' City Attorney � <br /> �, ���- � � %`��2 City Cler4c I� <br /> Juiy ��,zo�2 C�ty Counci! v <br /> . ,� � <br /> :' _ _ , C�ty Manager <br /> _�£�, .,. . . �� <br /> ;� ; _,_� {-� <br /> City Council =�-�- „��_ _..... _...� __ . _, �o�\C;�.. yL'.�� . � <br /> City ofRedwood City <br /> 1017 Middtefield RaacE <br /> Redwood City, CA 94463 <br /> Re: Grand 1ury Report: "Daes San Mateo County Need 13 Separate Police Dispatch Centers?" <br /> Dear Councilmembers: <br /> The 2Q11-2012 Grand dury filed a report on Iuly 17,2012 which cantains findings and recommendations perEaining <br /> to your agency. Your agency must submit comments, within 90 days, to the Hon. Gera[d 1. Buchwa[d. Your <br /> agency's response is due no later than October l5, 2Q12. Piease note that the response should indicate that it <br /> was approved by your governing body at a public meeting. <br /> For a13 findings,your responding agency shall indicate one of the following: <br /> L The respandent agrees with the finding. <br /> 2. The respondent disagrees w�olly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shatI specify <br /> ihe portcon afthe fnding that is dispated and shall include an explanation ofthe reasons therefore. <br /> Additional[y, as to each Grand Jury recommendation, your responding agency shall report one of the following <br /> actions: <br /> 1. The recommendation has been implemented,with a summary regarcEing the implemented action. <br /> 2. The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a <br /> time frarne for irnplerrientation, <br /> 3. The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of <br /> an analysis or study, and a time frame far the mat�er to be prepared for discussion by the officer or <br /> director of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of <br /> the public agency when applicab[e. This time frame shall nat exceed six months from the date of <br /> publication of the Grand dury report, <br /> 4. The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an <br /> explanation therefore. <br />