Agmt12 Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc.

Browse Search

EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform the specific tasks described below: Task 1. Identification of Proiect Chanqes Consultant will review the 2003 EIR project to identify and itemize the specific differences, both quantitative and qualitative, between the current Pete's Harbor proposal and the previous Pete's Harbor component addressed in the City-certified 2003 EIR. We will also compare these changes to the total Marina Shores buildout potential analyzed in the 2003 EIR, the Peninsula Park buildout potential analyzed in the 2007 Addendum, and the actual One Marina project under construction on the Peninsula Park site. The CEQA findings for each of these interrelated development scenarios can be integrated as necessary to provide the content for Addendum No. 2. Task 2. Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR Addendum No. 2 The Administrative Draft Addendum No. 2 to the 2003 EIR will be prepared with text, illustrations, and comparative tables which clearly and concisely describe: (1) the project changes as described in Task 1; and (2) whether the certified 2003 EIR with modifications adequately addresses the current Pete's Harbor proposal or if there are substantive new impact concerns or mitigation needs not considered in the 2003 EIR. For each environmental topic considered in the 2003 EIR, Administrative Draft Addendum No. 2 will summarize how the project revisions, as well as any changes in environmental conditions since 2003, affect each impact and mitigation finding, and whether there are any new or substantially more severe impact or mitigation findings not considered in the 2003 EIR. Administrative Draft Addendum No. 2 will contain only the information necessary to make the 2003 EIR adequate for the project as revised; the Addendum will not be "padded"with unnecessary information. If the CEQA evaluation reveals a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact, or if a new mitigation measure is identified which is considerably different from those identified in the 2003 EIR, Consultant will inform the City immediately to discuss how to proceed (e.g., Addendum with project modification, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Supplemental EIR). However, at this point and with all the information we have collected and discussed in consultation with City staff, an EIR Addendum is considered the appropriate CEQA document. Note that this proposal does not include a new shade and shadow technical study as suggested by the City's General Plan; the 2003 EIR does include a shade and shadow analysis for the previous, larger Pete's Harbor proposal. For this environmental topic, City staff will provide the appropriate data, and Consultant will peer review and incorporate the data into the CEQA analysis. ATTY/AGR/2012.109/MIG PETES HARBOR PROJECT REV:08-27-12 VR Page 10 of 12