My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt12 Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc.
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Agmt12 Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2013 9:55:24 AM
Creation date
9/26/2012 8:18:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Moore, Iacofano, Goltsman, Inc.
PROJECT NAME
Review of 2003 EIR re differences between previous and current Pete's Harbor proposal.
RMP File Number
304.5
Date
9/25/2012
MO Ref
13-168
Amendment
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT "A" <br /> SCOPE OF SERVICES <br /> The specific tasks needed to complete Revised Addendum No. 2 are described below. <br /> Task 1. Identify Proiect Chanqes <br /> Task 1 includes a three-step process. Consultant will review the revised Pete's Harbor <br /> proposal--including project plans, descriptive te�, and any applicant-supplied technical <br /> studies--against the previous Addendum No. 2 project, both quantitatively and <br /> qualitatively. This step will enable Consultant to revise the project description and to <br /> gauge which impacts might change, and to what extent, in the Revised Addendum. <br /> Consultant will compare the revised proposal with the Pete's Harbor component <br /> addressed in the certified 2003 Marina Shores Village EIR. <br /> Consultant will compare these changes to the total Marina Shores buildout potential <br /> (the combined Pete's Harbor and Peninsula Marina components) analyzed in the 2003 <br /> EIR, the Peninsula Park buildout potential evaluated in the 2007 Peninsula Park <br /> Addendum, and the actual One Marina project under construction on the Peninsula <br /> Park site. The CEQA findings for each of these interrelated development scenarios will <br /> provide substantial evidence for the Revised Addendum No. 2 findings. The <br /> groundwork for this second step was already established during preparation of <br /> previous Addendum No. 2. <br /> Chapter 2 (Proposed Project Changes) of Revised Addendum No. 2 will identify the <br /> changes between the current Pete's Harbor project and the Pete's Harbor <br /> component addressed in the certified 2003 EIR. <br /> Task 2. Prepare Administrative Draft EIR Revised Addendum No. 2 <br /> The foundation for Task 2 was already established during preparation of previous <br /> Addendum No. 2. <br /> Consultant will prepare the Administrative Draft EIR Revised Addendum No. 2 with text, <br /> graphics, and comparative tables which clearly describe: (1) the project changes as <br /> described in Task 1; and (2) whether the certified 2003 EIR with modifications <br /> adequately addresses the current Pete's Harbor project or if there are substantive new <br /> impact concerns or mitigation needs not considered in the 2003 EIR. For each <br /> environmental topic considered in the 2003 EIR, the Administrative Draft will <br /> summarize how the project revisions, as well as any relevant changes in environmental <br /> conditions and CEQA requirements since 2003, affect each impact and mitigation <br /> finding, and whether there are any new or substantially more severe impact or <br /> mitigation findings not considered in the 2003 EIR. <br /> REV: 09-05-13 VR <br /> ATTY/AGR/2013/AMENDMENTS/AMEND NO. 1 MIG PETE'S HARBOR <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.