My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-10-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-10-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2012 2:44:22 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 4:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/8/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 18 <br /> • Does the City have a long-term policy, project, program or proprietary interest in <br /> how the property is used? In this case, a long-term lease may make the most <br /> sense. <br /> • Is the property already fully developed, undeveloped or under-developed? If <br /> developed, was it intended to be used as leased space? <br /> • Are there limiting factors based on how the property was originally acquired, <br /> developed or used, such as grant, enterprise fund or donation requirements or <br /> conditions, that would favor or require long-term leasing over direct sale? <br /> • What is the appropriate lease term? Depending on the circumstances, the <br /> Council may enter into a lease for up to 99 years. Terms up to 99 years would be <br /> appropriate for leases where the intent, from a use and developer financing <br /> perspective, is intended to mirror a sale; but for the reasons outlined above, the <br /> City desires to retain fee-title. <br /> In most cases, the decision to sell or lease will require a balancing of competing interests that <br /> can best be weighed by the Council based on the circumstances at the time. <br /> The guidelines below are intended to provide the City with a framework for the best approach <br /> based on general principles. It is not intended to limit the approaches available to the City: the <br /> overarching principle is to utilize the approach that will best accomplish the City's objectives <br /> given the circumstances at the time. <br /> As outlined below, there are four basic approaches that the City may utilize to determine the <br /> best long-term use of City property by prospective purchasers or lessees: request for <br /> proposals, exclusive negotiations, broker services or competitive sealed bids (or a combination <br /> of these approaches). The Council will determine which approach to use on a case by case <br /> basis: <br /> 1. Request for Proposals (RFP). <br /> This approach makes the most sense when the City is initiating the sale or <br /> long-term lease of City property. It provides an opportunity to clearly <br /> articulate the City's policy goals and the general terms and conditions <br /> under which it will select the successful proposal. It is also an inclusive <br /> process and allows multiple proposers to participate in the process. This <br /> approach should be used when there is market interest in City land or <br /> when the City does not want to limit potential responders. <br /> ATTY/POLICIES/PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION PROCEDURES <br /> REV:10-04-12 PT <br /> Page 13 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.