My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-10-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-10-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2012 2:44:22 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 4:59:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/8/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 19 <br /> However, even with an RFP process, further exclusive negotiations are <br /> likely to follow the finalist selection. <br /> 2. Exclusive Negotiations. <br /> This approach makes the most sense when the City has engaged in an <br /> RFP and wishes to control to a greater degree the use and look of a <br /> particular development. Exclusive negotiations may be considered <br /> without an RFP in unique circumstances, such as where the proposal <br /> involves an exchange of City-owned property for property owned by the <br /> developer/property owner or where the property can be sold to an <br /> adjoining property owner in connection with a development proposal. In <br /> cases such as these, the project could not occur without the developer's <br /> property and no other developer could make a similar proposal. In cases <br /> where City proceeds directly to exclusive negotiations, there should be a <br /> clear link between the development proposal and accomplishment of <br /> significant City goals, plans or policies; the proposer should have a <br /> demonstrated record of completing highly successful projects in the City <br /> or similar communities; entering entirely into exclusive negotiations <br /> should clearly further the City's interests in achieving major policy <br /> objectives. An exclusive negotiation as a document rather than process is <br /> not always recommended as a precursor to a disposition agreement. <br /> Staff should consult with the City Attorney prior to engaging in <br /> negotiations to determine how to proceed. <br /> 3. Broker Services. <br /> This approach makes the most sense when the City is initiating the sale; <br /> the goal is primarily a financial one; and the conditions of the sale are <br /> straightforward. In some cases, a broker might handle particular <br /> transactions for a fee and the broker will take care of the transactional <br /> details. <br /> 4. Competitive Sealed Bids. <br /> This approach makes the most sense for sales when the City is initiating <br /> the sale; the goal is primarily a financial one; the conditions of the sale <br /> are straightforward; and the City believes that it can successfully market <br /> the sale without outside professional broker assistance. <br /> ATTY/POLICIES/PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION PROCEDURES <br /> REV:10-04-12 PT <br /> Page 14 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.