Laserfiche WebLink
IIi. Public Comments <br /> NOTE: Speakers are limited to three minutes, unless <br /> modified by the Chairperson. The Board cannot take action Brian Ponty <br /> on any matter raised under this item. The Chair asked for <br /> public comment. No public comment. <br /> Iv. Approval of Minutes: M/S Christensen/Aguirre to approve <br /> the minutes of the last meeting, Motion carried Brian Ponty <br /> unanimously by roll call vote with Member Lyon <br /> abstaining. <br /> V. Oral Report on Oversight Board, including Composition <br /> and other Miscellaneous Items <br /> (Oversight Boa�d Binder Tab No. Z) <br /> Mr. Bell notified the Board, that in consultation with the <br /> Mayor, he will step down from the Board and Mr. Lyon will <br /> be the appointed person representing Redwood City. He is a <br /> member of the largest Union RCMEA (Redwood City <br /> Management Employees Association) paid by the Craig Labadie <br /> Redevelopment Agency. <br /> Mr. Labadie said that based on this, he will not be providing <br /> the report on this matter. <br /> City Clerk Vonderlinden swore in Mr. Lyon as the appointed <br /> person, and Ms. Harris as an Alternate for the MidPeninsula <br /> Open Space District. <br /> VI. Consent to Professional Services Agreement with <br /> Craig Labadie <br /> (Oversight Board Binder Tab No, 4) <br /> City Attorney Thompson noted that the agreement needed <br /> to be retroactive to March 26, 2012. The Oversight Board <br /> concurred. Pamela Thompson <br /> M/S Aguirre/Navas to approve the agreement as presented <br /> and retroactive to March 26, 2012. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> Chair Holland signed the agreement at the meeting. <br /> VII. Review and Approval of Recognized Obligation Payment <br /> Schedules (ROPS) <br /> (Oversight Board Binder Tab lVo. 5) <br /> Chair Holland noted that not everybody got the packet on <br /> April 5, 2012. Mr. Ponty responded that there were no Bill Ekern <br /> bounced back emails received, so unfortunately it is not clear <br /> why some members did not get the packets, particularly <br /> once there was nothing caught on the city's spam filter. <br /> Mr. Navas said that he did get what was sent to him. <br /> 2 <br />