Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ponty led the discussion on the ROPS and Ms. Thompson <br /> noted that the job of the Board is to review the document. <br /> She noted this was not the only opportunity to comment on <br /> it. <br /> �ice Chair Roberts joined the meeting, <br /> Mr. Navas inquired about the findings and if staff of the <br /> Successor Agency looked at them. Ms. Thompson explained <br /> that the ROPS was organized in a different way to address <br /> this issue. <br /> The auditors' findings were discussed and it was asked if <br /> their report would go to the State. Legal Counsel Labadie <br /> confirmed that a copy is being sent to the Department of <br /> Finance. Chair Holland also confirmed that statement. <br /> Mr. Ponty noted that this is the ROPS that was approved by <br /> the City Council on Monday night, April 9, 2012. He referred <br /> to the color coding used. Green items are new or changed; <br /> and, orange is for items that are to be dropped. The orange <br /> shows that the City is not wanting to pursue these items, <br /> because they are no longer obligations and will no longer be <br /> listed on the ne� ROPS. In addition to the green and orange <br /> colors, items in purple are to be discussed separately; and, <br /> items in coral have been reclassified and have been shifted <br /> as a line item in the second ROPS. The uncolored items have <br /> not changed since the February 27, 2012 ROPS. <br /> Member Abbors joined the meeting. <br /> Mr. Ponty offered to go through all of the items listed on the <br /> ROPS with the exception of items in orange, since these will <br /> be dropped. Mr. Ponty went through the ROPS line item by <br /> line item starting with line one. As Mr. Ponty went through <br /> the ROPS, different questions were posed on the specific line <br /> items. One Oversight Board Member noted that it is <br /> commendable that City staff is able to contact the <br /> Department of Finance and receive a response. Ms. Ramirez <br /> provided some information as was requested. There was a <br /> request to have information, for the next ROPS, about the <br /> legal bills and what has been billed to date (line 9 of the <br /> ROPS). Other questions were posed about different items <br /> on the ROPS. <br /> It was requested that for future ROPS items that are not <br /> going to continue, be excluded. The Board requested that <br /> staff flag the items on the ROPS that were going to be part <br /> 3 <br />