My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2013 8:49:52 AM
Creation date
1/10/2013 4:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
1/14/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
662
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.4.A. - Page 2 <br /> Although it has been the City's practice for the City Council to approve the City's <br /> Engineering Standards, this and the requirement for compliance with those standards <br /> are being codified and clarified in the new Article I. <br /> New Article II requires all persons and companies working in the City's streets and right- <br /> of-way to first apply for and obtain an encroachment permit. The encroachment permit <br /> will contain requirements for insurance, performance bonds, indemnification of the city, <br /> the time within which the work must be completed, how the work must be accomplished <br /> and that a sign identifying who is doing the work be posted at the construction site. The <br /> proposed ordinance will specify that companies who have their facilities in the City's <br /> streets must relocate those facilities at their own expense if required by the City. <br /> The ordinance requires utility, cable and other companies who install their facilities in <br /> trenches in City streets to plan the location of their work in advance, to cooperate by <br /> sharing trenches when possible and to work with the City to avoid cutting new streets. <br /> Cutting or damaging the pavement of new streets is prohibited for five years after the <br /> City has constructed or resurfaced the street. This is to avoid the problem commonly <br /> experienced by the City where a company cuts and damages new pavement within <br /> months after the street was reconstructed or repaved by the City. Studies have <br /> demonstrated that cutting pavement so damages the street that the life span of the <br /> street is shortened by years and that no matter how well the cut is repaired, it is <br /> impossible to restore the street to its previous condition without reconstructing or <br /> resurfacing the street to the same extent as was done by the City. Although this five <br /> year requirement will be new to Redwood City, many cities in the surrounding areas <br /> have such prohibitions. The prohibition does allow pavement cuts in emergency <br /> situations, i.e. an emergency which endangers life or property, interruption of essential <br /> utility service, work that is mandated by a government agency, and for service to <br /> buildings where no other feasible means of providing service exists. This part of the <br /> ordinance will not go into effect for six months after adoption to give utilities and other <br /> contractor's time to complete planned projects and develop their five year plans. <br /> Repair requirements are strengthened by providing the City Engineer with authority to <br /> require repairs sufficient to restore the street to its previous condition. Because such <br /> repairs, when done on an individual basis can be quite costly, permittees are given a <br /> choice to do the full repairs themselves or to pay a fee into a fund to be combined with <br /> other fee payments allowing the City to merge the work into one or more larger cost <br /> saving projects. <br /> The amount of this fee will be established by Council resolution which will be brought to <br /> the Council at a later meeting, together with the other fees adopted by this ordinance. <br /> The other fees are: (i) A non-refundable application processing fee (currently this fee is <br /> lumped together with the plan check fee); (ii) A plan check fee which may be a deposit <br /> with any unused fees returned to the applicant or for very complex projects, the <br /> applicant may be required to pay additional amounts because this fee will be the actual <br /> cost to the City to check the plans; (iii) An inspection fee, which will also be a deposit to <br /> cover the actual cost of required inspections; (iv) A security fee or performance bond to <br /> ensure that damages are repaired or to reimburse the City if the City is required to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.