AgdaPkt 2013-01-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.B. - Page 14 Sigona's market to the north. The Use Permit Modification is limited to the gasoline station expansion and resulting reconfiguration of the existing on-site parking spaces and internal vehicular circulation to accommodate the gasoline station expansion. c. The use and its associated structures and facilities will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, the general welfare, or the environment. The expansion of the gasoline station from 12 fuel pumps to 20 fuel pumps would not result in any new or more severe significant environmental impacts beyond those previously addressed in the 2007 EIR and Addendum No. 1,including noise, traffic, and air quality. d. The use and facilities will not adversely affect or conflict with adjacent uses or impede the normal development of surrounding property. The proposed use would be an expansion of a previously approved gas station use, with the expansion of fuel pumps expected to minimize vehicle queuing and wait times resulting in a reduction in impacts to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, although the revised concept site plan dated November 9, 2012 would result in five (5) fewer parking spaces, there is adequate parking supply on the project site as document in the parking study; therefore, no new impacts to parking have been identified, compared to the previous Project. e. Adequate public and private facilities such as utilities, landscaping, parking spaces and traffic circulation measures are or will be provided for the proposed use. Adequate public and private facilities would be provided for the proposed use in that the demand for public services would be served by current facilities. Payment of development impact fees would allow school services to provide adequate services, and annual review of service levels for fire and police services would ensure acceptable levels are maintained. All private facilities including landscaping, parking and traffic circulation management would be provided and maintained by the Applicant in accordance with the City's requirements. f. Other findings required to be made in specific zoning districts as set forth in the Zoning Code. There are no additional findings that need to be made for the proposed use. Section 6. Architectural Permit AP2011-43: The City Council finds that: a. Sufficient variety in the design of the structure and grounds to avoid monotony in the external appearance of the project: The design of the canopy extension and landscaping would be consistent with the design of the existing canopy in that it would be an extension of the 2007-approved architectural design of the existing canopy. b. Size and design of the structure shall be in proportion to the building site and there is balance and unity among its external features so as to present a harmonious appearance: The design of the canopy structure is in proportion to the existing canopy structure in that it will be extended proportionally so as to cover the gas ATTY/RES0.2816/COSTCO REV: 12-19-12 VR Page 4 of 9