Laserfiche WebLink
7.B. - Page 73 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> have a less-than-significant impact on localized CO levels ("hot spots").If a project would increase <br /> traffic volumes at affected intersections by less than 44,000 vehicles per hour,the project would <br /> have a less-than-significant impact on localized carbon monoxide concentrations (Bay Area Air <br /> Quality Management District 2011). <br /> Vehicle Queuing Concentrations <br /> The impacts of vehicle idling associated with queuing at the fueling center was evaluated by <br /> conducting an analysis similar to that performed for CO "hot spots."Short-term ambient <br /> concentrations of CO3 NOa,and PM10 associated with increased vehicle queuing at the fueling center <br /> were modeled and compared to the applicable CAAQS or NAAQS (whichever was more health- <br /> protective).Table 4.4-3 summarizes the relevant significance thresholds. <br /> Table 4.4-3.Vehicle Queuing Concentration Thresholds <br /> Pollutant Averaging Time Concentration(µg/m3') <br /> NOz 1 hour 188 <br /> CO 1 hour 23,000 <br /> CO 8 hours 10,000 <br /> PM10 24 hours 50 <br /> Source:Ashworth Leininger Group 2012. <br /> Notes: * µg/m3=micrograms per cubic meter. <br /> Toxic Air Contaminants <br /> Projects that result in modeled project-level or cumulative risks associated with TAC emissions that <br /> exceed the thresholds summarized in Table 4.4-2 are considered by the BAAQMD to have a <br /> significant adverse impact.Because gasoline dispensing facilities do not emit PM2.5 emissions, <br /> thresholds related to PM2.5 are not relevant to this assessment. <br /> Odors <br /> The BAAQMD recommends that an odor source with five or more confirmed complaints per year <br /> averaged over three years be considered to have a significant impact on receptors located within <br /> specified odor screening distances.However,the BAAQMD's guidelines do not recommend a <br /> screening distance for evaluating gasoline dispensing facilities. <br /> Impact Discussion <br /> As discussed below,with implementation of the mitigation measures and standard conditions <br /> identified in the 2007 FEIR,the proposed modifications to the project would not result in any new <br /> or more severe significant air quality impacts beyond those previously addressed in the 2007 FEIR <br /> and 2007 Addendum No. 1,and no other changes in circumstances,or new information exists that <br /> would necessitate any major modification of the air quality discussions in the 2007 FEIR and 2007 <br /> Addendum No. 1. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for 4 Z8 September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project ICF 00154.12 <br />