My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2013 8:49:52 AM
Creation date
1/10/2013 4:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
1/14/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
662
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.B. - Page 73 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> have a less-than-significant impact on localized CO levels ("hot spots").If a project would increase <br /> traffic volumes at affected intersections by less than 44,000 vehicles per hour,the project would <br /> have a less-than-significant impact on localized carbon monoxide concentrations (Bay Area Air <br /> Quality Management District 2011). <br /> Vehicle Queuing Concentrations <br /> The impacts of vehicle idling associated with queuing at the fueling center was evaluated by <br /> conducting an analysis similar to that performed for CO "hot spots."Short-term ambient <br /> concentrations of CO3 NOa,and PM10 associated with increased vehicle queuing at the fueling center <br /> were modeled and compared to the applicable CAAQS or NAAQS (whichever was more health- <br /> protective).Table 4.4-3 summarizes the relevant significance thresholds. <br /> Table 4.4-3.Vehicle Queuing Concentration Thresholds <br /> Pollutant Averaging Time Concentration(µg/m3') <br /> NOz 1 hour 188 <br /> CO 1 hour 23,000 <br /> CO 8 hours 10,000 <br /> PM10 24 hours 50 <br /> Source:Ashworth Leininger Group 2012. <br /> Notes: * µg/m3=micrograms per cubic meter. <br /> Toxic Air Contaminants <br /> Projects that result in modeled project-level or cumulative risks associated with TAC emissions that <br /> exceed the thresholds summarized in Table 4.4-2 are considered by the BAAQMD to have a <br /> significant adverse impact.Because gasoline dispensing facilities do not emit PM2.5 emissions, <br /> thresholds related to PM2.5 are not relevant to this assessment. <br /> Odors <br /> The BAAQMD recommends that an odor source with five or more confirmed complaints per year <br /> averaged over three years be considered to have a significant impact on receptors located within <br /> specified odor screening distances.However,the BAAQMD's guidelines do not recommend a <br /> screening distance for evaluating gasoline dispensing facilities. <br /> Impact Discussion <br /> As discussed below,with implementation of the mitigation measures and standard conditions <br /> identified in the 2007 FEIR,the proposed modifications to the project would not result in any new <br /> or more severe significant air quality impacts beyond those previously addressed in the 2007 FEIR <br /> and 2007 Addendum No. 1,and no other changes in circumstances,or new information exists that <br /> would necessitate any major modification of the air quality discussions in the 2007 FEIR and 2007 <br /> Addendum No. 1. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for 4 Z8 September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project ICF 00154.12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.