Laserfiche WebLink
7.B. - Page 95 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> cubic feet per second (cfs)� (David Babcock&Associates 2011).This increase is minor and would <br /> not exceed the capacity of the existing stormwater drainage system.A WQMP containing BMPs to be <br /> utilized by the construction contractor would be prepared to reduce the potential for stormwater <br /> quality impacts from stormwater runoff during construction.Additionally,compliance with MRP <br /> Provision C.3 requirements would reduce new impacts from stormwater runoff to a less-than- <br /> significant level. <br /> f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br /> Less-than-Significant New Impact.As described in the discussion in Sections 4.6.a through 4.6.e, <br /> the proposed modifications would not result in any construction or operational impacts on water <br /> quality.Construction impacts would be reduced through the implementation of a WQMP. Potential <br /> construction impacts are addressed above and there are no other means by which construction or <br /> operation of the proposed modifications would substantially degrade water quality. New impacts <br /> would be less than significant. <br /> g. Place housing within a 100 year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard <br /> Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> No New Impact.As shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Community Panel Number <br /> 060325 0011 B,the project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area.The project site is <br /> located within Flood Zone C which is designated as an area with minimal flooding. Furthermore,the <br /> proposed modifications would not include the construction of new housing,and thus would not <br /> place housing within a flood zone.No new impact would occur. <br /> h. Place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood <br /> flows? <br /> No New Impact.As shown on the FIRM Community Panel Number 060325 0011 B,the project site <br /> is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area.The project site is located within Flood Zone C <br /> which is designated as an area with minimal flooding.As a result,the proposed modifications would <br /> not place structures within a flood zone that could impede or redirect flood flows. No new impact <br /> would occur. <br /> i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury,or death involving flooding, <br /> including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam;or inundation by seiche, tsunam% <br /> or mudflow? <br /> No New Impact.According to the City's General Plan Public Safety Element(Figure PS-5: Dam <br /> Inundation Flood Hazards),the project area is not located within any dam or levee inundation area. <br /> The closest dam inundation zone to the project site is the Emerald Lake dam inundation zone,which <br /> does not extend east of Cedar Street or north of Pennsylvania Avenue and which is approximately <br /> 0.30 mile west of the project site. Furthermore,according to the Pacific Institute,the project site is <br /> not located in an area predicated to be subject to coastal flooding due to climate change-induced sea <br /> level rise by 2100 (Pacific Institute 2012). No new impact would occur. <br /> �The existing runoff is 0.69 cfs=Composite C-Factor(0.84)x Rainfall Intensity(0.2 inches/hour)x Area(4.13 <br /> acres).The proposed runoff would be 0.70 cfs=Composite C-Factor(0.85)x Rainfall Intensity(0.2 inches/hour)x <br /> Area(4.13 acres).The difference between the existing and proposed runoff is (0.70-0.69)=0.01 cfs. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for 4-50 September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project ICF 00154.12 <br />