My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2013 8:49:52 AM
Creation date
1/10/2013 4:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
1/14/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
662
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.B. - Page 118 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> BAAQMD's approachg to addressing project-level and cumulative impacts associated with climate <br /> change is to identify emissions levels below which an individual project would not be expected to <br /> substantially conflict with existing California legislation enacted to reduce statewide GHG emissions. <br /> If a project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions above the relevant threshold,BAAQMD <br /> considers that it would contribute substantially to cumulative impacts and therefore should be <br /> considered significant.For stationary source projects requiring a District Permit to Operate (as does <br /> the Costco fueling center),BAAQMD recommends a threshold of 10,000 metric tons per year COae <br /> (Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2011).However,the source of GHG emissions from this <br /> project is not the stationary source aspect; fuel station emissions are volatile organic compounds, <br /> such as benzene,which are not considered GHG emissions.The sources of GHG emissions from this <br /> project are the increased vehicle trips and changes in vehicle queuing. For land use projects, <br /> wherein transportation-related GHG emissions occur due to changes in trip generation,BAAQMD <br /> recommends a threshold of 1,100 metric tons per year COae(Bay Area Air Quality Management <br /> District 2011).This 1,100 metric ton threshold for land use projects is used in this analysis because <br /> it is more suitable and stringent than the 10,000 metric ton threshold for the stationary source <br /> projects. <br /> BAAQMD does not recommend a GHG emission threshold for construction activities. However,the <br /> BAAQMD recommends that GHG emissions from construction be quantified and disclosed using the <br /> most up to date calculation and analysis methods.The BAAQMD also recommended that lead <br /> agencies include a discussion of feasible construction mitigation necessary to reduce GHG emissions. <br /> Impact Discussion <br /> Would the project: <br /> a. Generategreenhousegas emissions, either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant <br /> impact on the environment? <br /> Construction Emissions <br /> Less than Significant New Impact. GHG emissions from the construction of the proposed <br /> modifications would primarily result from the use of diesel-powered construction equipment and <br /> heavy-duty haul trucks.Table 4.12-1 summarizes the construction-related GHG emissions from <br /> diesel-fueled equipment and vehicles as well as the gasoline-fueled employee vehicles.As shown in <br /> the table,the project would generate 24 metric tons of COae during the construction period.This is <br /> equivalent to adding five typical passenger vehicles to the road in a year(U.S.Environmental <br /> Protection Agency 2011). Because construction emissions would cease once construction is <br /> complete and the amount of GHG emissions generated by project construction are small,this new <br /> GHG impact would not be significant. <br /> g As noted above,although the 2010 BAAQMD guidelines are not formally adopted,due to a recent Alameda County <br /> Superior Court ruling,the City finds that the proposed significance threshold in the(now)draft guidelines are <br /> appropriate and technically justified to use in CEQA analysis by the evidence included in the guideline documents. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for 4 73 September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project ICF 00154.12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.