Laserfiche WebLink
MA,v,6.1.F. - Page 38 �D ANALYSIS <br /> Sewer utility expenses increased slightly due to the increased payments to South Bayside System Authority for <br /> wastewater treatment, offset by the decline in one-time costs associated with the Redwood Shores sewer spill in <br /> the prior fiscal year. <br /> The expenses of the parking fund remained flat at$2.4 million. <br /> The Port of Redwood City experienced an 11.4% increase in expenses due to increased depreciation expense <br /> resulting from capital asset acquisitions and the completion of several large, multi-year capital projects. <br /> FINANCIAL ANALY515 OF THE CITY'S FUNDS <br /> As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal <br /> requirements. <br /> Governmental Funds <br /> The general government functions are contained in the general, special revenue, debt service, and capital project <br /> funds. The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and <br /> balances of spendable resources by using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such information is useful in <br /> assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure <br /> of the City's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. <br /> At June 30, 2012, the City's governmental funds reported combined fund balances of$91.5 million, which reflects <br /> a decrease of$11.8 million from the beginning year balance. <br /> Governmental fund revenues decreased $.4 million this year to $108.6 million. Significant decreases occurred in <br /> the redevelopment agency fund, and the low and moderate income housing fund, offset by increases in the <br /> general fund, the transportation grants fund, and the One Marina Community Facilities District fund revenues. <br /> Expenditures, including capital outlay, increased $8.5 million this year to $115.5 million. Most of the increase was <br /> attributable to the $10.3 million expenditure for the potential state takeaway of the accumulated funds set aside <br /> pursuant to the agreement with the Legal Aid Society to use certain tax increment revenue for low and moderate <br /> income housing purposes, and the increased general fund expenditures related to public safety. This increase was <br /> partially offset by the decrease in the redevelopment agency fund expenditures as the Agency was dissolved <br /> effective February 1, 2012. <br /> The general fund is the primary operating fund of the City. At June 30, 2012, unassigned fund balance of the <br /> general fund was$17.2 million, while total fund balance decreased to $19.8 million from a beginning fund balance <br /> of $24.8 million primarily due to $3.3 million in land that was transferred back to the former Redevelopment <br /> Agency in FY 2011/12. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unassigned <br /> fund balance and total fund balance to total fund expenditures. Unassigned fund balance represents 21.4% of <br /> total fund expenditures,while total fund balance represents 24.7%of that same amount. <br /> The following are the major funds that qualified under the reporting criteria for major funds selection: <br /> General Fund - General fund revenues increased approximately $3.4 million this fiscal year primarily due to <br /> increases in property taxes, sales and other taxes, and fire services, offset by declines in other categories of <br /> revenues. Sales taxes increased $1.3 million and transient occupancy tax increased $.9 million due to the <br /> continued recovery from the recession and the voter approved increase in the transient occupancy tax rate from <br /> 10% to 12%. Property taxes increased $1.9 million. The increase in property tax resulted from a shift of property <br /> tax increment revenue from the dissolved Redevelopment Agency to other taxing agencies within the former <br /> 10 <br />