Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 31 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 1.Introduction <br /> CEQA Requirements for Use of an Addendum <br /> The City has determined that preparation of an Addendum to the EIR pursuant to Section 15164 of <br /> the CEQA Guidelines is the most appropriate method for including the correct technical Attachments <br /> to Appendix D of the Draft EIR.Section 15164(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states: <br /> [t]he lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR <br /> if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section <br /> 15162 [of the CEQA Guidelines] calling for preparation for a subsequent EIR have occurred. <br /> Section 15162(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states: <br /> (a)When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project,no <br /> subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines,on the basis <br /> of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record,one or more of the following: <br /> (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the <br /> previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant <br /> environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified <br /> significant effects; <br /> (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is <br /> undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration <br /> due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br /> the severity of previously identified significant effects;or <br /> (3) New information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have <br /> been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was <br /> certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted,shows any of the following: <br /> (A)The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous <br /> EIR or negative declaration; <br /> (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown <br /> in the previous EIR; <br /> (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact <br /> be feasible,and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, <br /> but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative;or <br /> (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those <br /> analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects <br /> on the environment,but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure <br /> or alternative. <br /> None of the criteria set forth in the CEQA Guidelines cited above have been triggered by the <br /> inclusion of this information;therefore,it is the City`s determination that an Addendum to the EIR <br /> for the previously approved project is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed <br /> modifications.The proposed modifications do not trigger the need for a Supplemental or <br /> Subsequent EIR under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines because the proposed modifications <br /> would not result in the identification of new significant environmental impacts nor substantially <br /> increase the severity of previously identified significant environmental impacts.This Addendum No. <br /> 2 provides an analysis of the proposed modifications,and does not result in any new conclusions <br /> about project impacts or mitigation measures. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project 1-Z ICF 00154.12 <br />