My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso13 PC 13-04 March 26 2013 Laurel Way EIR
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Reso13 PC 13-04 March 26 2013 Laurel Way EIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2013 10:10:35 AM
Creation date
4/18/2013 9:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
3/26/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Facts in Support af Finding: Mitigation Measure Biology-7 woald raquire cansultation R+ith <br /> the U.S, Army Corps of Engineeirs(ACOE)to dete�minc which,if any,wetlands <br /> on site are jurisdiction�l and to verify the boimdaries of the wetlaud ta a11ow for <br /> mit�gation�reduce impacts to wetlands to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Mitigation Measure Biology-8 would require that the spplicant obtain and comply <br /> with permits peitaining to water bodies, as ncccssary,from ACOE,CDFG,and <br /> the Regional Water QuaZity Coatrnl Board;thia campliance wauld require <br /> compensation for impacts to wetlands and would reduce unpacts tn a less�than- <br /> significar�t Xevel.Nlitigation Mcasure Bioiagy-9 would require instsll,ation of a <br /> temporary cofferdam to divert watet,with a pipeline tha�diverts the watel'aeound <br /> t�e p�a�ect site a�nd back in.t�the downstream draina�e to divert flow arc�und the <br /> projFCt area during grading far the ma�d aad inst�,ilatian of a ceilvert. Miligation <br /> Measure Biology-10 would require a BMP plea that inc�udes measuras bo reduce <br /> siltation.These mitigation measures would reduce impacts ta wetiaada during <br /> construction to a less-than-significant Ievel. <br /> Mitigataan Measure Biology-I 1 wrnild reduce the emowit of tr�sh that oould <br /> obstru�t natural drainage-ways to r+eaYuce potential impacts to drainage and natural <br /> habitat to be less than significant. <br /> Impact 3.3-2 and propoaed mitigation are described on pages 3.3-16 through 3.3- <br /> 17 of the Dtaft EIR aad page 4-15 of the Revised Final EIR,which ere hereby <br /> incorporated by z�ference. <br /> Impact 3.3-3 <br /> ImpsCt: Construction af the project would result in loas af poten�ially jurisdictional <br /> wetFand areas. <br /> Mitigation: Mi�igation Meq�ure Biology-7: The wettand deIineation completed in 2009$hall <br /> be snbmittt�d to the U.S.A�my Corps of Engincers for verificatian.During the <br /> verification pmcess,the USACUE wiU.det�nnine which wetlands on site are <br /> regulated by them. <br /> M�tfg$�ion Meaeare Biology-S:The applicant shall abtain a11 necessary pennits <br /> P�r�ining to affected Waters of the United States reguiated by the U.S.Army <br /> Corps af Engineere, Califomia Department af Fish and Game, and San Fran�cisco <br /> Bay Regional Water Qua�ity Cantrol Boarc�, Discharge of fiIl into Waters af the <br /> United S�ates will require a Clesn Water Act Section 4U4 perinit fronl the U.S. <br /> Army Corps of Enginee;rs and Clean Water Act Section �01 certification fro�n the <br /> San Francisco Bay Regional Wa#�Quality Control Board. The applicaat shall <br /> comply with all oonditions in the approved permits at aIl times.The permitting <br /> process will likely r�uire compensatioa for impacts to wetland�. Compensat'ron <br /> cou�d include purchase af mitigation credits�ar the affec�ed habitat types at an <br /> establishec�mirigation bank,preservat�on aad enhancement of in-ldnd habitat <br /> types,or cre�tivn and preservation of in-1dn�habitat types. <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.