Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 59 Attachment 6 <br /> Appropriations subject to Article XIIIB generally include the proceeds of taxes levied by <br /> the State or other entity of local government, exclusive of certain State subventions and refunds <br /> of taxes. "Proceeds of taxes" include,but are not limited to, all tax revenues and the proceeds to <br /> an entity of government from (i) regulatory licenses, user charges, and user fees (but only to the <br /> extent such proceeds exceed the cost of providing the service or regulation), and (ii) the <br /> investment of tax revenues. Article XIIIB includes a requirement that if an entity's revenues in <br /> any year exceed the amounts permitted to be spent, the excess would have to be returned by <br /> revising tax rates or fee schedules over the subsequent two years. Certain expenditures are <br /> excluded from the appropriations limit including payments of indebtedness existing or legally <br /> authorized as of January 1, 1979, or of bonded indebtedness thereafter approved by the voters <br /> and payments required to comply with court or federal mandates which without discretion <br /> require an expenditure for additional services or which unavoidably make the providing of <br /> existing services more costly. <br /> Proposition 218 <br /> General. On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, the so-called <br /> "Right to Vote on Taxes Act." Proposition 218 added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the State <br /> Constitution, which affect the ability of local governments to levy and collect both existing and <br /> future taxes, assessments, and property-related fees and charges. Proposition 218, which <br /> generally became effective on November 6, 1996, changed, among other things, the procedure <br /> for the imposition of any new or increased property-related "fee" or "charge," which is defined <br /> as "any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a special tax or an assessment, imposed by a [local <br /> government] upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including <br /> user fees or charges for a property related service" (and referred to in this section as a <br /> "property-related fee or charge"). <br /> Specifically, under Article XIIID, before a municipality may impose or increase any <br /> property-related fee or charge, the entity must give written notice to the record owner of each <br /> parcel of land affected by that fee or charge. The municipality must then hold a hearing upon <br /> the proposed imposition or increase at least 45 days after the written notice is mailed, and, if a <br /> majority of the property owners of the identified parcels present written protests against the <br /> proposal,the municipality may not impose or increase the property-related fee or charge. <br /> Further, under Article XIIID, revenues derived from a property-related fee or charge <br /> may not exceed the funds required to provide the "property-related service" and the entity may <br /> not use such fee or charge for any purpose other than that for which it imposed the fee or <br /> charge. The amount of a property-related fee or charge may not exceed the proportional cost of <br /> the service attributable to the parcel, and no property-related fee or charge may be imposed for <br /> a service unless that service is actually used by, or is immediately available to, the owner of the <br /> property in question. <br /> In addition, Article XIIIC provides that "the initiative power shall not be prohibited or <br /> otherwise limited in matters of reducing or repealing any local tax, assessment, fee or charge. <br /> The power of initiative to affect local taxes, assessments, fees and charges shall be applicable to <br /> all local governments and neither the Legislature nor any local government charter shall impose <br /> a signature requirement higher than that applicable to statewide statutory initiatives." <br /> Judicial Interpretation of Proposition 218. After Proposition 218 was enacted in 1996, <br /> appellate court cases and an Attorney General opinion initially indicated that fees and charges <br /> levied for water and wastewater services would not be considered property-related fees and <br /> charges, and thus not subject to the requirements of Article XIIID regarding notice,hearing and <br /> protests in connection with any increase in the fees and charges being imposed. However, three <br /> -36- <br />