My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso13 PC 13-09 2859 Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Kensington
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Reso13 PC 13-09 2859 Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Kensington
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2013 4:26:34 PM
Creation date
5/28/2013 9:28:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
5/21/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
565
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� .'I�""lw, ��,;f�I ', iil w, [N a �i���, "�,�I:u'T I�1 �, ., ��.. <br /> ��ff i �t��..'' . 1_'y' � � l I�C.�^t., . <br /> An overview of the findings for each tree species is contained in Table 1' -Tree Species <br /> Summary. This ta bfe contains tree population and population percentages, caunt of <br /> reguidt�ti and heriiage "trees and suitability for preservation ratings <br /> The assessed trees were evaluated tor structure, health and overall condition. Table 2- <br /> Evaluation Factors for Determining Overall Tree Condition defines the characteristics for <br /> each rating. <br /> In addition, assessed trees were rated as ta suitabifity�or preservation. Table 3-Suitability <br /> Factors for Tree Preservation explains the method af the rating system. Suitability for <br /> preservation is especially valuable wher� used a5 a design component by architects and <br /> planners. This qualitative tree data are contributing factors when deciding the cast- <br /> efFectiveness and the reasonableness of wheth�r to accommodate a tree by design. It <br /> is important to note that na tree was obsenred ta be highly suitable for preservation. <br /> All recorded tree data including, tree tag number, tree identification,trUnk <br /> measurement, overall condition, regulated or Heritage tree status, remove or preserve <br /> status, suitability rating, observations and recommendatians are contained in Table 4- <br /> Tree Assessmerrt Chart. <br /> Tree Preservafion Issues by Species <br /> The yucca plants,two by the former restaurant. Both trees 41 and 42 are very mature but <br /> the leaves can be a hazard when the trees are not properly maintained. (See photos i <br /> and 2) The common name Spanish dagger is ar� apt description. This is not a highly <br /> vaiued tree species nor is it suitable for the intended �se of the site. <br /> On the east side of the building is an expar�sive southern magnolia tree 43. (See phota 3) <br /> The dense canopy displays stunted growth related to drought stress. A lovely tre� but <br /> intolerant to raot disturbances. (Matheny, Clark 1998} <br /> Along the eastern property perimeter stands a line af 10 poorly pruned evergreen pears <br /> trees 44 thro�gh 53. Beginning from the sidewalk, the tirst eight trees (See photos 4 <br /> through 7) were in generally fair condition the iast two {See photo 8) have issues perhaps <br /> with light and poor drainage. Like many ornamental pears, these trees were headed <br /> back, (branches and fimbs two inches or greater in diameter were arbitrarily cut) <br /> initiating an abundance of water sprouts. Presenration by relocation i5 not a cost <br /> effective optian considering the species and special pruning attention required to <br /> create suitable specimens for the praposed landscape. <br /> Oio ,����T': il��'��i CN.'�!"d' �..�°Y`d'���i�n° ;�dif �ti���:lr'n. ���"a", �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.