Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 2 Continued <br /> Tree Surve <br /> Tree No. Common Name Diameter Circumference Overall Condition <br /> 47 ever reen ear 9 28 Fair <br /> 48 ever reen ear 9 28 Fair <br /> 49 ever reen ear 8 25 Fair <br /> 50 ever reen ear 8 25 Fair <br /> 51 ever reen ear 7 22 Fair <br /> 52 ever reen ear 7 22 Fair <br /> 53 ever reen ear 7 22 Poor <br /> 54 valle oak 14 44 Poor <br /> 55 En lish walnut 22 69 Poor <br /> 56 En lish walnut 22 69 Poor <br /> 57 En lish walnut 26 82 Fair <br /> 58 En lish walnut 16.5 52 Fair <br /> 59 En lish walnut 22 69 Poor <br /> 60 En lish walnut 17.5 55 Poor <br /> 61 En lish walnut 16 50 Poor <br /> 62 En lish walnut 16.5 52 Poor <br /> 63 En lish walnut 19 60 Ve Poor <br /> 64 En lish walnut 20 63 Ve Poor <br /> 65 coast live oak 9.5 30 Fair <br /> 66 coast live oak 10 31 Fair <br /> All trees located on-site are proposed to be removed. The trees have low suitability for preservation <br /> and would not likely survive relocation or preservation in place. None of the trees surveyed are <br /> currently designated as heritage trees. <br /> 4.4.2 Environmental Checklist and Discussion <br /> BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Less Than <br /> Significant Significant With Significant No Impact Beneficial Information <br /> Mitigation Impact Source(s) <br /> �p�� Incorporated �p�� <br /> Would the project: <br /> 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ 1,2,3 <br /> either directly or through habitat <br /> modifications, on any species <br /> identified as a candidate, sensitive, or <br /> special status species in local or <br /> regional plans,policies, or regulations, <br /> or by the California Department of <br /> Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and <br /> Wildlife Service? <br /> Kensington Assisted Living Facility Project 27 Initial Study <br /> Redwood City Apri12013 <br />