My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso13 PC 13-09 2859 Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Kensington
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Reso13 PC 13-09 2859 Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Kensington
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2013 4:26:34 PM
Creation date
5/28/2013 9:28:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
5/21/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
565
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Less Than <br /> Significant Significant With Significant No Impact Beneficial Information <br /> Mitigation Impact Source(s) <br /> �p�� Incorporated �p�� <br /> Would the project: <br /> 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ 1 2 3 <br /> > > <br /> any riparian habitat or other sensitive <br /> natural community identified in local <br /> or regional plans,policies,regulations, <br /> or by the California Department of <br /> Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and <br /> Wildlife Service? <br /> 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ 1 2 3 <br /> > > <br /> federally protected wetlands as <br /> defined by Section 404 of the Clean <br /> Water Act(including,but not limited <br /> to,marsh,vemal pool,coastal, etc.) <br /> through direct removal, filling, <br /> hydrological interruption, or other <br /> means? <br /> 4) Interfere substantially with the ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ 1 2 3 <br /> „ <br /> movement of any native resident or <br /> migratory fish or wildlife species or <br /> with established native resident or <br /> migratory wildlife corridors,impede <br /> the use of native wildlife nursery <br /> sites? <br /> 5) Conflict with any local policies or ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ 1,2,3,8 <br /> ordinances protecting biological <br /> resources,such as a tree preservation <br /> policy or ordinance? <br /> 6) Conflict with the provisions of an ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ 1 2 3 <br /> > > <br /> adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, <br /> Natural Community Conservation <br /> Plan, or other approved local,regional, <br /> or state habitat conservation plan? <br /> 4.4.2.1 Vegetation and Wildlife Impacts <br /> The proposed project site is in a highly urbanized area with mostly landscape and ruderal vegetation <br /> on-site. While the site does have two native coast live oak trees,the site does not contain any <br /> habitats that would support endangered or special-status species. There are no waterways or <br /> wetlands on-site. Therefore,implementation of the proposed project would not impact special-status <br /> or endangered species or any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. (No Impact) <br /> The project would not conflict with any adopted habitat conservation plan,natural community <br /> conservation plan, or other approved local,regional, or State habitat conservation plan. (No Impact) <br /> Kensington Assisted Living Facility Project 28 Initial Study <br /> Redwood City Apri12013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.