My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso13 PC 13-09 2859 Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Kensington
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Reso13 PC 13-09 2859 Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Kensington
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2013 4:26:34 PM
Creation date
5/28/2013 9:28:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
5/21/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
565
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4.8.2 Environmental Checklist and Discussion of Imnacts <br /> HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than <br /> Significant With Significant No Impact Beneficial Information <br /> Impact Mitigation �p�f �P�f Source(s) <br /> Incorporated <br /> Would the project: <br /> 1) Create a significant hazard to the � � � � � 1,2,3 <br /> public or the environment through the <br /> routine transport,use,or disposal of <br /> hazardous materials? <br /> 2) Create a significant hazard to the � � � � � 1,2,3,10 <br /> public or the environment through <br /> reasonably foreseeable upset and <br /> accident conditions involving the <br /> release of hazardous materials into <br /> the environment? <br /> 3) Emit hazardous emissions or handle � � � � � 1,2,3 <br /> hazardous or acutely hazardous <br /> materials, substances,or waste <br /> within one-quarter mile of an <br /> existing or proposed school? <br /> 4) Be located on a site which is � � � � � 1,2,3,10 <br /> included on a list of hazardous <br /> materials sites compiled pursuant to <br /> Government Code Section 65962.5 <br /> and, as a result,would it create a <br /> significant hazard to the public or <br /> the environment? <br /> 5) For a project located within an � � � � � 1,2,3 <br /> airport land use plan or,where such <br /> a plan has not been adopted,within <br /> two miles of a public airport or <br /> public use airport,would the project <br /> result in a safety hazard for people <br /> residing or working in the project <br /> area? <br /> 6) For a proj ect within the vicinity of a � � � � � 1,2,3 <br /> private airstrip,would the proj ect <br /> result in a safety hazard for people <br /> residing or working in the project <br /> area? <br /> 7) Impair implementation of, or � � � � � 1,2,3 <br /> physically interfere with, an <br /> adopted emergency response plan <br /> or emergency evacuation plan? <br /> 8) Expose people or structures to a � � � � � 1,2,3 <br /> significant risk of loss,injury or <br /> death involving wildland fires, <br /> including where wildlands are <br /> adjacent to urbanized areas or <br /> where residences are intermixed <br /> with wildlands? <br /> Kensington Assisted Living Facility Project 47 Initial Study <br /> Redwood City Apri12013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.