Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. ,b-& ossm^n, 11 S..r' ngaaie i°'ny. . wumm r. d a l -tt"'r -hint he s003 3 til" d been sent to Council members concerning the P -Combining District pro- posed to be added to this area, because it gave too much latitude for changes. He stated he would like very much to see the P designation eliminated from the F,dgewood Hills property. John Hickey, P44 Ferndale tray, protested a.nnexa- tion. to Redwood City of any part: of his property, although not a part of this proposed annexation. Councilman Teckley informed Mr. Hickey if his property were included in a portion where majority desired to annex, he would be included.. Planning Director reviewed procedures necessary by both Planning Commission and Council to effect any chance in either use or density with "P"-Combi.nina District imposed. He, however, advised Planning Commission not altogether satisfied with ordinance concerning this section and that it might possibly be in need of a review. He also advised the Council of the advantages of use of the "P" Com- hininr District in areas of this size for obtaining a more attractive and better planned development, with a scrutiny of preliminary plans being possible whereas this would not be as applicable under .regulatory restrictions, which tend to pro- duce only stereotyped and uninteresting plans. Discussion held on serving of utilities to this area and further questioning as to density proposed by -rd ndditien of statement by Councilman Henderson---' zoning recommended. 7-. ...a Redwood City Civic Assn., appeared to protest; the "P" designoti.on to this zoning. Mr. Aubrey Fairfax, 175 Atherton, and owner of property adjoining Fdgewood Road, stated their desire this site be chosen for college site, but i.n event it: was not, stressed fact zoning had to be such that it would be economi.czii ly feasible to develop. Council questioned possibility of continuing public hearing until on amendment be made to zoning ordinance concerning P designation. Councilman Petersen moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried. Councilman Petersen moved to introduce Ordinance adding Section 60.1..5 to Ordinance No. ll?0, the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance, prezoning property in the vicinity of the proposed Edgewood Hills Annexation, seconded by Councilman Rosselli, and lost by tied roll call vote, Councilmen Bury, Henderson, and Teckley voting no, Councilmen Petersen, Rosselli and Mayor Herkner voting yes, Councilman Granter being noted absent. After further discussion as to merits of prezoning and time schedule should amend- ment be made to Zoning Ordinance concerning P designation, Councilman Petersen moved to reconsider a reintroduction of the prezoning ordinance proposed, seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried on rollcall vote, Councilman Bury voting no, Councilman Granger being noted Pbsent. Councilman Petersen moved to re -introduce Ordinance prezoninF Rdgewood Hills Annexation, seconded by Councilmen Rosselli and carried on roll call vote, Coun- cilman oun-cilman Bury voting no, Counc il_mon Granger being noted absent.