Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PTJ_9_L,TC FF_�,771777, nppnn., of Ninhnn! M, Nan & Assov4,t-s frnm dol of Architnrtura_l Pommiftan on their npplicAtlon Vo- or-hitecturql approval of P s7x-unit apartment qt 5no nak nverup, declared open and rffidavits of publication and mqil!n7 a-d-r?rl P11-1, St7ff reported Archttocturn! Committe, KnIed gun-ovF! on March 24, iqG, for the follnwirg reasons: "I. The room VInplad as a recreation room has nil the facilities of f-, studio anq-tment, includim complete kitchen and bath fpciTitles. P, Access to all units on the second flno- ore by outside corridor which renuired that occupants puss in front of bedroom windows of all units ... (for full Ktalls-Son repnrt) Architactural Committon r,ili cnntirue to resist apartments desiFned in this manner. 1. Althou7h not , specific responsibility of the Architectural rommitten it was noted that the bott-rom opens direct7y into the dining space. Tn addition to the specific Atoms as outlined above, the Commit te- found the oytorior appPnr7ncn not to be plansinq, and expressed n unanimous belief that we should be nble to expect better archit-nture frnm a licensed n-ch4tPct .:I Mr. Tnpn appeared in hts own behalf and pro- tested varinus points which he felt should not hpvp been cons ldrnd as part nf PrrhItPctur21 Committee's decision for denial of his plan. such is intarinr arrnn7mnnt of buDdIn7 Councilman 7rn�1ny statpd that Mr. Tnon wns granted a permit Pel -cart 20, 3969, and did not apply for a Puild%7 Permit until March ?, 1966, which nutompticnUy csncelled the variance rranted for his building. He also added, however, that "ft"', o permit is issued, a bulldin7 could not be altered, ns hnd boon c2nimed by Staff in this instance. Zoning Coordinator from illustrated map of area and plans of huildinn described site Pnd proposed building structure and nature of the Area. Ofter further discussion on points of denial by the Architectural Commifty, and foolinn denial based mainly on e-terior desiRn for this site, Councilmnn Kenkiny mnved to affirm the etton of the Architectural Committee and denied appeal, s-cnnded by Councilman bury and carried. (MTNUTF ORDER 06-1101 PTJPiTC Resolution of Tntention of the Plnnninr Commission to prezone the area vnown as the "Edgnwood HiKs Annexotinn" declared open and affidavits of uublicntai on and mail%7 ordered filed. Report of Planning Comm: ssion reed U which it was recommended that aper between Fdrevind Road and Pabertson Way be 7nnIn7 ?H-lPo-P; that the roarldo- Prow between Robertson Way and Park 4-y b- zonnd PH -20; and that the remainder of the corridor Prea, easterly of Park Nay be zoned, RH, rouncil informed that protests received at the Planning Commission publY hpariny generally related to a desire to mpint, in a low density area in the hii1s, to assure that the zonin7 would not increase the value of the Pmuorty to main it prohibitive in cost for n co3leEn site, and to ossurp that a mnssivo cut and fill operation is not reiulred for the dnvelopment of this nma. Mr. Holmes of Holmes Boalty Company, statin7 he was rpprespntK7 several property owners adjacent to this proposed annexation, nuestiored when utilitIP5 might be possible. City Mana7pr stqted several parcels not included in this plan because of City',-, -4nqbTlity to supply them with sewer and water because of topography, and which could better be served from Woodside. He also advised improvements such As these Pre not mvdo until prop: rty nwnprs request thom, qnd then qssnosment districtr wor. ;r -d