Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Fr. Trife!QttT q1so wv"nnd delay of nrol-ct enuld result in hi_Zher Pnsto and ur7nd prn- co-dim -1thout KeIny, CnunQUmPr Pr, ter son -uoptlnned v7rlusirn7 of nr-nv-Q iWah had been proYrnVy rnr- sidared for norticiprWn and in nnn.rnrnrs noir ibilitips hod b9on Ponsidarod for thas- parties, nr other meins which mi "ht ho pnnsibin to rennun a shore of th- on2ts from these porn,"s, C117y TNn.,r'-r outlined possibUty of raccuphng fundy should ten- t9tivp V -ns for a school for wAr2s m9terinlize for Nt, Alvcrnn Convent th-nush enn- noction Pops for utilities and a pons iblo --tnnsion of Wilmington Yay to ronnont to Frm Hill Boulevard, Furthpr dAscussinr hold on pnnnibilit!,3 of future d-volorments, in this a -pa and recouping of cQctr Or avlopnsion of utilities Nith s"bsenuent con- npotlor fens. Councilman Henderson Puestioned whether •P11 parties had wreed to propos-d narticl- potion nFrooment, Pxaqpt Redwood City, and was advised this was the case, city Mpnp7pr stressed fact Staff in rpcommendin7 Council apurnvol of pprticinption a7rnpmant. felt it to be a frAr. and Y-ult7bin distritaut inn of coats, 41th City's enntr1hutirr bpvin(- bo-n bud7et-6 for the cnm1n7 yeny, City Mangror wns as�ed If there had been Stror, anprnvni on this pro !-vt, and ho advised Cnunril of or, ornblem area cnncernin- Uo-ffY indeyps WT) Phich meant a heavier base "f mck -as beinr recommandpd, at lo?rt on th,- ternlnus, than arf7inqUy intended, PnJ which would cost nbnut $20,000 and f1sur-s upre adlusted to -oflect this in incidnVol n7p-n,e nstimrtes, still leaving 15C for incl- jontals. Mr. Frahm advised this recommendption hrd been expnnded to inplude V2 of Farm Hill Roulnv7rd on this "TT" not luA t end of boulevard as stptpd. Mr. TrifelptY otnted this also would affect the 6001 they will construct, but reminded there would also bn ro1mbursement from State on these charges which would he -picked up by City but not by thoir company. Q1t7 Attorney QdLTi sed he could find no maximum or minimum contribution of narticinpnts stated in the proposed q7ronment and asked if council dosired this stated. Council indicated annroval and Wl pa-tipinants prnsent answered in the aff-r-niatIvn. (m -m, 9/26/66) Councilman Bandorsnr moved to ajont BTSOKUTTnN Nn, 5046 ApppnVTNG PAUTCUATYWIGul- FARM Hill ?0U17VARD EXTENSTnm AND AUTHOPTZITC' TTS KNECUTTnN, On inc A i m -n Kockloy. on -upstion, asked if Staff orrPed to fixed nontributicn fl -pure as shown in the proposed ngreement. city Managar a7nin stntat Staff believed distribution np costs to be an enult(ble spread of costs for this pryart. Notion seconded by Councilman "Pckley and carried an roll cal) vnte. Councilman Oranner and Rossoll! bqjn- P"tori abs-nt. Francis W. Pearson, Mr�mber of Board of College Trus- tees of an I.Tatoo Co,�-Ieye, thanked Council for won- dnrful cooperation received and expressed his opinion that this was a historical mept%7 by renson of the unin"e alrenm.nnt involving so many different agencies. ._TP felt it 7oula result in Canada College project beinr: completed by Fall of 108 with at Wast 2.60n enroll - ,re nt , Councilman Peterson asked that a pro7ress ronort be made on the "hipple.0 CRmInn prclert at neyt regular Coun"ll meet%7 of June ,'th. (',;Iemn 6/26/636)